US House Makes Crypto History: Marathon 9-Hour Vote Sparks Regulatory Breakthrough

Washington just put crypto back on the menu—with a side of political theater. Lawmakers pulled an all-nighter to push digital assets into the spotlight, proving even Congress can't ignore blockchain's relentless march toward mainstream finance.

The vote heard 'round Crypto Twitter

Nine hours of debate. Countless amendments. One clear message: crypto's political capital is growing faster than a memecoin pump. The House's unprecedented session signals regulators might finally be catching up to what traders have known for years.

Behind the scenes of a legislative moonshot

Insiders whisper this could be the opening salvo in Washington's long-overdue crypto reckoning. Will it lead to clear rules? Or just more bureaucratic foot-dragging? Either way—the industry now has Wall Street's attention (and their lobbyists' phone numbers).

As one exhausted staffer tweeted mid-vote: 'We're either writing the next chapter of financial history... or the most expensive episode of C-SPAN ever.' Place your bets—the house always wins.

House Reignites Crypto Legislative Efforts

In a narrow 215–211 vote on July 16, the U.S. House of Representatives moved forward on three significant pieces of cryptocurrency legislation, restoring momentum for federal crypto regulation after an initial breakdown a day earlier. The advancement came after a record nine-hour vote and intense intra-party negotiations, reflecting both the stakes and division surrounding digital asset oversight.

The bills, the CLARITY Act, GENIUS Act, and Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, are part of what Republican lawmakers are branding as “Crypto Week,” a legislative push aimed at addressing longstanding regulatory ambiguity in the U.S. digital asset sector.

What do the Bills Propose?

Central to the package is the GENIUS Act, which proposes strict reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers. Already passed in the Senate, the bill is intended to bring greater accountability to stablecoin operators amid growing concerns about financial stability and user protection.

The CLARITY Act, also known as the Financial Innovation and Technology (FIT) Act, seeks to define jurisdictional boundaries between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The legislation aims to resolve years of inter-agency disputes that have left crypto markets in regulatory uncertainty.

Perhaps the most politically charged is the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block any future implementation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the U.S. Advocates of the bill argue that a digital dollar could infringe on personal financial privacy and lead to surveillance akin to authoritarian regimes.

Behind the Scenes: Political Maneuvering and Trump’s Influence

The July 15 vote had initially failed due to internal resistance from a bloc of Republican lawmakers demanding an explicit prohibition on a digital dollar. That condition was later met by incorporating a CBDC ban into the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), unlocking support to proceed with the crypto bills.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, who led negotiations with dissenting Republicans, confirmed that he had spoken directly with former President Donald TRUMP to discuss the bills. Johnson cited Trump’s strong support for the Anti-CBDC measure as a pivotal factor in achieving consensus, saying,

“Sometimes it takes longer than at other times, but it’s all part of the process. We built consensus, and we got it done tonight.”

Ultimately, only one Republican lawmaker, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, opposed the rule advancement.

Path Forward: Debate, Amendments, and Uncertainty

With the rule vote cleared, the House can now MOVE to formal debate and amendments on the three crypto bills. Votes on the GENIUS and CLARITY Acts are expected within days, though timelines remain flexible.

While the advancement marks a milestone for crypto advocates, final passage remains uncertain. DEEP partisan divisions and the upcoming August recess could delay or derail progress. Moreover, the Democratic-controlled Senate may take a different approach to certain provisions, especially regarding CBDCs and surveillance concerns.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice