SEC Weighs Trump’s Semi-Annual Reporting Plan: Transparency Clashes with Business Efficiency

Wall Street's watchdog faces a regulatory crossroads—balancing investor protection against corporate burden.

The Proposal: Cutting Red Tape or Cutting Corners?

Trump's push for semi-annual reporting instead of quarterly updates divides the financial community. Supporters claim it reduces short-term pressure on executives. Critics argue it masks operational weaknesses—perfect for smoothing over a bad quarter or two.

Market Impact: Less Data, More Speculation

Fewer disclosures mean wider bid-ask spreads and increased volatility. Institutional investors hate uncertainty—retail traders might not notice until it's too late. Another classic case of simplifying things until they're dangerously opaque.

The SEC's Dilemma: Transparency Versus Flexibility

Regulators must decide whether less frequent reporting actually serves Main Street—or just gives executives longer to hide problems. Because nothing says 'trust us' like asking to report financials half as often.

Final Thought: In finance, less information rarely leads to better decisions—but it definitely makes it easier to blame someone else when things go wrong.

Quarterly reporting mandated since 1970 post-1929 crash

The SEC mandated for companies to report quarterly in 1970, part of its decades-long push to increase transparency following the stock market crash in 1929. For investors and executives alike, the future of quarterly reporting could reshape incentives in the world’s biggest equity market — determining whether US companies stay chained to the clock or win more freedom to focus on the long game.

 “Subject to SEC Approval, Companies and Corporations should no longer be forced to “Report” on a quarterly basis (Quarterly Reporting!), but rather to Report on a ‘Six (6) Month Basis,’” Trump said on social media. “This will save money, and allow managers to focus on properly running their companies.”

Shifting away from quarterly reporting “seems like a gigantic step backward,” said Nell Minow, chair of ValueEdge Advisors, which consults institutional investors on corporate governance issues. US markets have stayed so robust because this level of transparency boosts trust, she said.

But critics have argued that such reporting has its downsides. The practice increases costs, pushes companies to focus on the short-term — hampering investment and innovation — and can lead to overreactions by investors, opponents say.

Whether Trump’s intervention sparks serious regulatory change remains to be seen, but his comments throw fresh political fuel on a debate that goes to the heart of how the US measures corporate performance. 

After Trump’s comments in 2018, the agency asked for public comment on quarterly reporting, but didn’t finalize a change to requirements.

Nasdaq backs giving firms choice of quarterly or semi-annual

Adena Friedman, Nasdaq Inc.’s chair and chief executive officer, said the exchange supported reforms to reduce the burden on public companies, including giving firms the option to report either quarterly or semi-annually, according to a statement on LinkedIn. The exchange proposed companies having the option to do semi-annual reporting in a policy paper earlier this year. 

Trump compared the US reporting process to China’s, suggesting that Beijing had a system in place that was more efficient and cost-effective for businesses in that country. 

In Europe, most firms are only mandated to report every six months, but many still file quarterly results for several reasons, including investor expectations. 

Supporters of quarterly reporting say it’s necessary to keep investors informed and reduces the chances of market manipulation.

“Companies spend far too much time on the churn of quarterly reporting,” said Matt Powell, a longtime sports industry analyst and current senior adviser for BCE Consulting. “On the other hand, you need to balance that with investors having enough good information to make intelligent decisions.”

‘Misses get bigger’

Shifting to reporting every six months could also boost uncertainty and volatility on earnings results. 

“While the goal WOULD be to get investors and companies to become more long-term focused, it would increase uncertainty in the equity market and could lead to a lowering of valuations,” said Brian Nick, head of portfolio strategy at Newedge Wealth. “Earnings season moves could also be larger as misses get bigger and more consequential.”

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has been a frequent critic of disclosures that many companies view as overly burdensome without providing significant benefit to shareholders. 

The agency included a possible proposal on its recently-issued regulatory agenda to “rationalize disclosure practices” — a potentially wide-ranging topic that could eventually encompass a number of measures. 

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Published on September 16, 2025