3 Reasons XRP Enthusiasts Should Still Be Cautious in 2025

XRP bulls keep charging—but these red flags demand attention.

Regulatory Whiplash Isn't Over Yet

Even with recent wins, global regulators still eye crypto like hawks. One misstep—or a sudden policy shift—and XRP's momentum could slam into a wall.

Adoption Hype ≠ Real-World Usage

Plenty of partnerships get announced; far fewer ever scale. Until XRP moves meaningful volume daily, it's all promises and press releases—classic crypto theater.

Market Sentiment Shifts in a Blink

Crypto markets turn on a dime. A single tweet, a whale's sell-off, or macro fears could erase gains faster than a 'degen' leveraging 100x.

Staying cautious isn't FUD—it's just smart investing. Even in a bull run, not every coin moons. Sometimes, they just crash back to earth.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. The most valuable customers have plenty of alternatives

For the banks, asset managers, payment companies, and other financial institutions that XRP wants to serve with its ledger, the XRPL, the competition is vigorous, well-capitalized, and guaranteed to be consistently contesting its market share of capital.

is especially concerning, as it's the default home of asset tokenization, decentralized finance (DeFi), and stablecoin management. Traditional financial institutions likeare comfortable building there, in part due to the decent staking yields that the chain offers. It's getting even more comfortable for that sector as time passes, with asset issuers launching tokenized U.S. Treasury bills and credit products. Both of these are essential tools for financial institutions, thereby cementing Ethereum's institutional gravity even further.

Emerging payments-and-stablecoins chains like's Arc,'s Tempo, and's newly announced chain may pose a serious threat to XRP over the long term (if not right now, as none of those three have fully launched yet). Existing stablecoin chains, like, are likely contesting the XRP Ledger's stablecoin status as well.

Therefore, the total addressable market (TAM) for XRP is as real and as large as ever. But so is the head-to-head pressure from other chains with entrenched integrations and liquidity, as well as new contenders arriving on the scene. If the next wave of large institutions keeps defaulting to Ethereum, XRP's share of new flows could lag even as the sector grows.

2. XRPL's stablecoin base is still small

The effect of competition in the stablecoin market is already sufficient to make XRP a bit player. There are only about $90 million in stablecoins parked on the XRPL.

That matters because stablecoins are the fiat currency cash equivalents of crypto. Deep, native stablecoin liquidity makes a chain easier for corporate treasurers, financial market makers, and app developers to use every day. On the leading chains, depth is not the problem. ethereum hosts roughly $159 billion in stablecoins, which gives it a big edge in attracting new capital from institutional investors.

In comparison, XRPL's stablecoin footprint is early. The all-important stablecoin assetonly launched natively on XRPL on June 12, so building up balances will take time. While Ripple's own stablecoin,, has grown quickly, with a circulating supply NEAR $700 million, it's still much less than Ethereum's stablecoin base.

In other words, even if XRP's design is attractive for asset managers and asset issuers alike, day-to-day liquidity for large flows is thinner than on chains where stablecoins already function. Liquidity begets more liquidity, so closing that gap is a key medium-term execution risk for the coin's investment thesis.

3. Don't let enthusiasm turn into over-allocation

The final reason to be cautious about XRP is that being reckless with it could compromise your portfolio's diversification, and leave you vulnerable to experiencing significant downturns if the coin doesn't behave as you desire. Over the long term, there will definitely be at least one such period like that, in case it wasn't obvious.

So, how much of an allocation to XRP is sensible? There is no single right answer, but many mainstream frameworks call for small allocations with rebalancing.

If you limit your allocation to 1% to 2% of your portfolio's total value, the overall risk for your portfolio will be modest, while still getting you exposure to your position quietly growing into something meaningful. To put it even more clearly, there's no need to bet the farm here, and doing so is not advisable.

Still, if you are bullish on XRP's trajectory, a larger allocation might be warranted. But the case for maintaining caution is more compelling. Overallocation and irrational exuberance, not investment thesis mistakes, are what usually hurt long-term results. Keep XRP inside a diversified portfolio, and you will benefit plenty if the market breaks your way.