AI Titans Nvidia and Palantir Face Jaw-Dropping 42% to 74% Plunge—Wall Street’s Boldest Bears Sound the Alarm

The artificial intelligence revolution has two undisputed champions: Nvidia and Palantir. But not everyone’s buying the hype.

Wall Street’s resident skeptics are waving red flags—predicting brutal corrections of 42% and 74% for these high-flyers. Are we witnessing the first cracks in the AI edifice?

Nvidia’s chips may power the future, but some analysts see its valuation as a time bomb. Palantir’s government contracts can’t silence whispers of overinflated expectations. Meanwhile, hedge funds keep cashing checks while retail investors hold the bag—some things never change.

One thing’s certain: in the casino of tech stocks, even the house doesn’t know when to fold ‘em.

Image source: Getty Images.

But as is the case with all next-big-thing innovations, this Optimism isn't universal. Although an overwhelming percentage of Wall Street analysts have buy ratings and lofty price targets attached to the faces of the AI revolution --(NVDA -1.04%) and(PLTR 7.64%) -- there are exceptions.

Based on reports and issued price targets from two select Wall Street analysts, these foundational pieces to the evolution of artificial intelligence can plummet 42% and 74%, respectively, over the coming year.

Nvidia: Implied downside of 42%

Arguably no AI stock is more loved by Wall Street than Nvidia. Its graphics processing units (GPUs) hold the bulk of AI-data center market share and act as the brains powering split-second decision-making, generative AI solutions, and the training of large language models. Out of the 66 analysts who've issued a buy-, hold-, or sell-equivalent rating on Nvidia, 59 rate its stock a buy.

What keeps Nvidia stock from being universally loved is analyst Jay Goldberg of Seaport Global. Goldberg is the lone Wall Street analyst to have a sell rating on Nvidia, with a price target of $100. If Goldberg's pessimistic prognostication was to come to fruition, the largest publicly traded company would tumble 42%.

One of Goldberg's top criticism's of Nvidia is something I've been beating the drum on for the last year: internal competition. Though external competitors are ramping up their production of AI-GPUs, Nvidia's top threat may very well come from its own top customers by net sales.

Most members of the "Magnificent Seven," which happen to be some of Nvidia's top clients, are developing AI chips to use in their data centers. Even though these chips can't stand up to Nvidia's GPUs on a compute basis, they're considerably cheaper and not backlogged. In other words, they're going to minimize the AI-GPU scarcity that's helped drive Nvidia's pricing power and gross margin higher.

Goldberg is also skeptical of the sustainability of the AI spending cycle.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang isn't sparing any expense when it comes to sustaining his company's competitive edge. He aims to bring a new advanced AI chip to market annually, with Blackwell Ultra being the next in line to reach clients. While newer and faster chips should, on paper, help Nvidia support its premium pricing, it could also quickly depreciate prior-generation AI chips, such as the Hopper (H100). If previous generation AI-GPUs rapidly depreciate, it may delay upgrade cycles and/or irritate key customers.

The other consideration here is that every next-big-thing technology since (and including) the proliferation of the internet has endured a bubble-bursting event early in its existence. Though it's impossible to predict when the music will stop since bubbles are typically driven by emotions, historical precedent doesn't lie. Investors consistently overestimate the adoption and utility of game-changing technologies.

If an artificial intelligence bubble was to form and burst, there's not an AI stock that WOULD be more directly impacted than Nvidia.

Image source: Getty Images.

Palantir Technologies: Implied downside of 74%

But on a comparative basis, the projected downside for AI-data mining specialist Palantir Technologies over the next year is even more pronounced.

According to longtime Palantir bear Rishi Jaluria of RBC Capital Markets, Palantir stock is headed to $40, which would represent a 74% pullback from where shares of the company closed on August 1. It's worth noting that Jaluria previously had an $11 target on Palantir entering 2025.

Palantir stock has rallied more than 2,300% since the start of 2023 due to its shift to recurring profitability, as well as its irreplaceability. Though Palantir's enterprise-focused Foundry platform has some small-scale competition, neither Foundry nor its government-driven Gotham platform, which assists with military mission planning and execution, have large-scale challengers. This has led to consistent operating cash FLOW and sales growth of 25% or greater on an annual basis.

Jaluria's displeasure with Palantir boils down to two factors.

First, RBC Capital's software analyst is skeptical of Foundry's sales momentum. In a note released prior to Palantir's first-quarter operating results being revealed, Jaluria expressed his concerns that Foundry's rapidly rising margins were the result of one-off deals. Given the level of personalization needed of Foundry to satisfy its clients needs, it's not yet clear if this is a rapidly scalable segment.

But make no mistake about it, the biggest problem with Palantir, in the eyes of Rishi Jaluria, is its valuation. As of the closing bell on Aug. 1, Palantir was tipping the scales at a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 123. To offer some idea of how far outside of historical norms this is, industry-leading companies on the cutting-edge of the dot-com bubble topped out at P/S ratios of roughly 30 to 40. No megacap company has ever been able to sustain a P/S ratio above 30, let alone four times that amount.

Something else that should be taken into consideration is Gotham's narrow pool of potential clients. An AI- and machine learning-driven platform that assists with data collection and military mission planning isn't something that China, Russia, or dozens of other countries will be granted access to. In fact, only America and its immediate allies are potential buyers of these solutions. This places a genuine ceiling on Gotham's growth potential, which isn't ideal for a stock trading at a nosebleed valuation.