RFK Jr. Sparks Outrage: Dumps Medical Experts for AI in Shocking Health Policy Overhaul

RFK Jr. just lit a match under the healthcare establishment—by betting your diagnosis on algorithms instead of doctors.

Machines Over MDs

His new policy draft swaps white coats for server racks, claiming AI 'cuts costs and bypasses human error.' Never mind that time WebMD told you a headache was brain cancer.

Wall Street’s Silent Cheer

Hedge funds are already pricing in the savings—more profit from sickcare, less spent on pesky specialists. Because nothing says 'efficient market' like letting ChatGPT prescribe your beta-blockers.

This isn’t innovation. It’s a bloodless coup—with your health as collateral.

TLDRs:

• RFK Jr. plans to overhaul federal health agencies using AI, sidelining expert input.
• His push to replace animal testing with AI models at the FDA is drawing scientific skepticism.
• Proposed AI automation of the vaccine safety reporting system (VAERS) has raised fears of data misuse.
• Experts warn Kennedy’s policies could fuel vaccine misinformation and undermine public trust in health institutions.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s sweeping plan to embed artificial intelligence into the U.S. health system is drawing fire from scientists, regulators, and public health experts who say the MOVE risks sidelining evidence-based medicine in favor of untested automation.

AI to Replace Expertise in Federal Health Plans

In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his vision of a future where artificial intelligence becomes central to government health operations.

According to Kennedy, the department is undergoing what he calls an “AI revolution.” Critics, however, fear that revolution may be rooted more in ideology than sound science.

Kennedy urged Americans to “stop trusting the experts” and instead rely on machine-driven models to guide everything from fraud detection to public health interventions. That stance has sparked widespread concern among researchers, many of whom say Kennedy’s understanding of AI and its limits is dangerously shallow.

Animal Testing on the Chopping Block

One of the more dramatic shifts comes at the Food and Drug Administration, where Kennedy is accelerating the transition away from animal testing. Under his directive, the agency has begun using AI-driven models and foreign safety data in the drug approval process. This move builds on the 2022 FDA Modernization Act, which relaxed previous animal testing requirements, but experts argue the current technology cannot fully replace in vivo trials.

The National Association for Biomedical Research recently reiterated that while alternative methods like organoid cultures and computational models hold promise, there is still no complete substitute for animal models in ensuring drug safety and efficacy.

VAERS Overhaul Raises Alarm

Perhaps the most contentious proposal lies in Kennedy’s plan to revamp the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS. Often misused by anti-vaccine activists, VAERS is a voluntary reporting tool meant to detect rare side effects from vaccines. Kennedy wants to automate it using AI, potentially transforming the system into a self-operating engine for vaccine risk assessments.

Critics worry that automation could lead to flawed data interpretations, particularly if AI tools are designed or trained without rigorous scientific oversight. There are already concerns about Kennedy’s objectivity, given his long history of opposing vaccines and promoting unsubstantiated medical claims.

Bias and Mistrust Could Undermine Public Health

The heart of the backlash isn’t just about AI. It’s about trust. Experts say that any data-driven system is only as reliable as the inputs and intentions behind it. If algorithms are built around Kennedy’s own skeptical views on vaccination, the resulting data could reinforce public fear, not alleviate it.

Already, Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again Commission” has come under fire for releasing a report riddled with false citations, allegedly produced using AI tools. The fear now is that similar unvetted technology could soon be responsible for making critical health policy decisions.

Dr. Paul Offit, a prominent vaccine expert, warns that Kennedy’s leadership could have dire consequences.

“He is an anti-vaccine activist and a conspiracy theorist,” Offit said. “He will do everything he can to make vaccines less accessible, less affordable, and more feared.”

As Kennedy barrels ahead with plans to embed AI into America’s health infrastructure, the debate continues over whether technology can truly replace scientific consensus or if it’s simply being weaponized to validate fringe beliefs.