Rep. Keith Self Leads Charge to Block Fed’s Digital Dollar in Defense Bill—Crypto Advocates Cheer
Congress draws a line in the sand against CBDCs—just as the Fed was warming up its money printer.
The Battle Over Digital Sovereignty
Keith Self’s amendment to the 2025 defense bill could slam the brakes on the Federal Reserve’s digital dollar ambitions. Critics call it a power grab; libertarians hail it as a firewall for financial freedom.
Why Washington’s Scrambling
Politicians suddenly care about monetary policy—must be an election year. Meanwhile, Bitcoiners smirk as the old guard frets over losing control of the rails.
The Irony Department
The same lawmakers who rubber-stamped trillion-dollar stimulus packages now pretend CBDCs are the real threat to privacy. Cue the world’s smallest violin.
Conservative Leaders Criticize Missing CBDC Provisions in NDAA
The absence of CBDC restrictions in the NDAA has sparked anger among many conservative lawmakers. GOP leaders had previously pledged that language addressing concerns over a government-backed digital currency WOULD be included. However, when the bill was released, these provisions were missing, frustrating those who had fought for a ban on the digital dollar.
Rep. Self’s amendment seeks to address this gap. He argues that the initial promise was not upheld and has taken the initiative to fix the bill. The Texas lawmaker emphasized that while Congress must pass the NDAA, it must also ensure that protections against CBDCs are included to safeguard Americans’ financial privacy and freedom.
Concerns Over Government Control and Surveillance
Several Republicans have voiced strong opposition to the idea of a CBDC. They believe that a digital dollar would give the government unprecedented control over financial transactions. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) warned that a CBDC would “insert the government between you and your money.” Critics argue that such a system could be used to track spending, limit purchases, or impose restrictions on how individuals use their money.
Supporters of Rep. Self’s amendment share these concerns. They argue that government-backed digital currencies would undermine individual freedom and privacy. As a result, they have called for permanent legal restrictions on CBDCs, not just temporary executive orders.
House Rules Committee to Decide Fate of Amendment
Rep. Self’s amendment will be reviewed by the House Rules Committee, which will decide whether it moves forward for a full House vote. This decision will play a crucial role in determining whether Congress will officially debate and possibly ban a U.S. CBDC. Lawmakers are under pressure to act decisively, as the NDAA is a critical piece of legislation that typically enjoys wide bipartisan support.
The committee’s decision will mark a significant moment in the ongoing debate about the future of digital currencies. If the amendment passes, it will reflect growing opposition to government control over money, particularly in a digital form. Rep. Self has made it clear that he expects the committee to “do the right thing” in protecting citizens’ financial rights.
Rep. Keith Self’s push to block the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC in the NDAA underscores the growing concern about government surveillance and control over personal finances. As lawmakers continue to debate the issue, it remains clear that CBDC restrictions will be a focal point in the ongoing defense bill discussions.
