Huobi Founder Li Lin Launches $1 Billion Ethereum Trust with Asian Investors in 2025
- Why Is a $1B Ethereum Trust Making Waves in 2025?
- Who Are the Power Players Backing This Ethereum Mega-Trust?
- How Does This Trust Differ From Bitcoin’s Institutional Playbook?
- What’s the Bigger Picture for Ethereum’s Financialization?
- Will This Accelerate Ethereum’s Regulatory Clarity?
- How Might This Reshape Crypto’s Competitive Landscape?
- What’s Next for Institutional Crypto Adoption?
- FAQs: Huobi Founder’s $1B Ethereum Trust
In a bold move signaling Ethereum’s growing institutional appeal, Huobi founder Li Lin has teamed up with heavyweight Asian investors to launch a $1 billion ethereum trust. Backed by crypto veterans like Shen Bo (Fenbushi Capital) and Xiao Feng (HashKey Group), this Nasdaq-targeted vehicle aims to provide regulated ETH exposure—potentially reshaping Ethereum’s role beyond DeFi into a treasury asset. The timing couldn’t be sharper: as Bitcoin ETFs dominate headlines, this trust positions Ethereum for its own institutional breakout moment.
Why Is a $1B Ethereum Trust Making Waves in 2025?
When Huobi’s founder partners with Asia’s crypto elite to park nine figures into Ethereum, you know something’s brewing. This isn’t just another fund—it’s a strategic play to bridge Ethereum’s tech with traditional finance. Half the capital comes from HongShan Capital (ex-Sequoia China), while Li Lin’s Avenir Capital chips in $200M. The goal? To create a Nasdaq-listed structure that lets institutions tap into ETH without regulatory headaches. Given Ethereum’s recent scalability upgrades and its dominance in tokenized assets (think RWA projects flooding the chain), this trust could be the Trojan horse for mass institutional adoption.

Who Are the Power Players Backing This Ethereum Mega-Trust?
The lineup reads like a who’s who of Asian crypto royalty: Shen Bo, who’s been backing Ethereum since its 2015 infancy through Fenbushi; Xiao Feng from HashKey (Asia’s answer to Coinbase); and Cai Wensheng of Meitu Inc.—the selfie app giant that famously allocated $100M to crypto in 2021. These aren’t speculative traders; they’re infrastructure builders. As Joseph Lubin noted at London’s DAS summit earlier this year, “Ethereum’s compliance-ready architecture is finally getting institutional respect.” This trust crystallizes that shift—it’s effectively a bet that ETH will become the backbone of tokenized finance.
How Does This Trust Differ From Bitcoin’s Institutional Playbook?
While bitcoin ETFs like BlackRock’s IBIT target store-of-value demand, Li Lin’s Ethereum vehicle leans into utility. Think of it like comparing gold (BTC) to oil (ETH)—one’s held, the other fuels systems. The trust’s prospectus hints at exposure to staking yields and layer-2 ecosystems, areas where Ethereum outpaces Bitcoin. Data from CoinMarketCap shows ETH’s active addresses now double BTC’s, suggesting stronger network effects. One BTCC analyst (who requested anonymity) put it bluntly: “This isn’t your grandpa’s crypto fund—it’s a yield-generating machine wrapped in regulatory compliance.”
What’s the Bigger Picture for Ethereum’s Financialization?
Beyond the $1B headline, this trust reflects Ethereum’s quiet conquest of traditional finance rails. Remember when Meitu bought ETH at $1,700 in 2023? That same team now sees ETH as collateral for corporate treasuries. The trust’s structure—reportedly incorporating Proof-of-Stake rewards—could set a precedent for how institutions engage with programmable assets. TradingView charts show ETH/BTC breaking out of a 2-year downtrend, suggesting markets are pricing in this institutional pivot. As former BlackRock exec Joseph Chalom noted, “Tokenization isn’t coming—it’s here, and Ethereum’s the engine.”
Will This Accelerate Ethereum’s Regulatory Clarity?
By choosing a Nasdaq listing, Li Lin’s group is forcing regulators’ hands. The SEC has long danced around ETH’s security status, but a $1B publicly traded product leaves little wiggle room. Industry insiders speculate this could fast-track Ethereum’s “commodity” classification—a green light for more institutional products. Interestingly, the trust avoids the “ETF” label entirely, perhaps sidestepping the SEC’s ETF approval fatigue. Either way, as one Hong Kong-based fund manager told me, “When Sequoia’s leftovers (HongShan) bet this big, even skeptics pay attention.”
How Might This Reshape Crypto’s Competitive Landscape?
Bitcoin maximalists won’t like this, but the trust underscores Ethereum’s unique positioning. While 172 companies now hold BTC as treasury reserves (per Bitcoin Treasuries data), Ethereum’s value proposition isn’t just holding—it’s using. The trust’s design reportedly incorporates DeFi integrations, meaning institutions could soon earn yields on ETH holdings through Aave or Compound. This isn’t your 2021 “number go up” narrative; it’s 2025’s “infrastructure pays dividends” reality. No wonder Robert Kiyosaki recently doubled down on ETH alongside gold and silver.
What’s Next for Institutional Crypto Adoption?
Watch for domino effects: more trusts, clearer regulations, and perhaps even central bank experiments. With Ethereum’s Dencun upgrade slashing layer-2 costs by 90% this year, the network is primed for enterprise use. The BTCC team notes that ETH futures open interest just hit $12B—a sign of mounting institutional interest. As for retail? They’ll likely ride the coattails through new ETFs or, ironically, via the very DeFi protocols institutions are now embracing.
FAQs: Huobi Founder’s $1B Ethereum Trust
Who is funding the Ethereum trust?
HongShan Capital (formerly Sequoia China) leads with $500M, followed by Li Lin’s Avenir Capital ($200M) and other private investors.
When will the trust launch?
Targeting a Nasdaq listing by Q1 2026, with preliminary operations starting November 2025.
How does this differ from a spot Ethereum ETF?
It combines ETH holdings with staking yields and potential DeFi integrations—features most ETFs avoid due to regulatory uncertainty.
Why are Asian investors dominating this initiative?
Hong Kong and Singapore have clearer crypto regulations than the U.S., making them natural hubs for institutional crypto products.
Could this trigger similar Bitcoin trusts?
Unlikely—Bitcoin’s lack of programmable utility makes yield-generating structures less viable compared to Ethereum.