Breaking: PELOSI Act Clears Senate Committee by Razor-Thin Margin – What’s Next for Crypto?
Washington’s latest political theater just delivered a cliffhanger—the PELOSI Act scraped through Senate committee approval today. Here’s why it matters for your portfolio.
The backroom brawl: After months of lobbying (and at least three ‘crypto killer’ op-eds), the bill survived by a margin thinner than a DeFi protocol’s security budget.
What’s in the box? Zero details yet—typical D.C. move—but insiders whisper it could redefine how Congress interacts with digital assets. Cue the lobbyist champagne.
Market pulse: BTC barely flinched on the news. Either traders don’t care… or they’ve finally learned to ignore political noise. (We’ll believe it when we see it.)
Closing thought: If history repeats, this ‘landmark legislation’ will either get gutted beyond recognition or morph into a pork-barrel bonanza. Place your bets—the house always wins.
Legislative Background and Transparency
Originally introduced by Senator Hawley, the PELOSI Act is named after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She and her husband, Paul Pelosi, were accused of profiting off insider information during her tenure. However, Pelosi denied the accusations and no evidence was found to prove insider trading. Further, she also supported the act.
During her tenure, lawmakers were accused of leveraging privileged information for personal financial gain through stock transactions. Despite initial support from Sen. Bernie Moreno, who had co-sponsored the bill, he had been criticized by the Republican committee members for the expedited legislative process.
The committee members labeled it a “publicity stunt” and questioned the thoroughness. To get enough support from both parties, Democrats agreed to make an exception for President Donald Trump. This compromise helped the bill MOVE forward through the committee.
86% of Americans Back Congressional Stock Trading Ban
The advancement of this legislation reflects a more comprehensive demand by the public for ethical and moral governance. According to Senator Hawley, a total of 86% of Americans favor restrictions on congressional stock trading. This action highlights the ongoing tension between maintaining legislative integrity and addressing the financial implications for elected officials.
He also stated that, “Americans have watched politicians earn a fortune using information not available to the general public while the average family struggles to get by. It’s just wrong.” He further added, “Members of Congress should be focused on delivering results for their constituents, not returns on investments. It’s time to find out where members stand. It’s time we restore trust in Congress and ban all members from trading and holding stocks.”
The Act has successfully passed a Senate committee and is now set for consideration by the full Senate and the House of Representatives. If the act is passed, it could improve oversight of politicians’ financial activities and WOULD reduce the risks of market manipulation, especially in growing sectors like cryptocurrencies.
However, the bill’s progress had raised concerns about the potential for stricter future regulations that could suppress innovation within the markets. This legislative milestone emphasizes the growing demand for accountability in public office, with the overwhelming public backing highlighting a national appetite for transparency.
Yet the bill’s journey through Congress reveals persistent tension regarding how to best reconcile this transparency with the practical realities of legislation. This involves safeguarding public trust by ensuring that elected officials’ financial freedoms are not unduly restricted.
Also Read: Algeria Criminalizes All cryptocurrency Activities Under New Law
