Vitalik Buterin Slams AI 2027’s ‘Doomsday’ Hype: ‘Misaligned Fearmongering’
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin just torched the AI 2027 doomsday narrative—calling it a ‘misaligned’ distraction from real tech risks. No sugar-coating, no hedge-fund jargon—just a blunt takedown of Silicon Valley’s latest apocalyptic grift.
Why the pushback? The 2027 timeline reeks of arbitrary scaremongering, says Buterin. It’s the kind of deadline you set when your AI startup needs another funding round—not when you’re solving existential risks.
Meanwhile, crypto keeps building. While AI doomers cash checks for predicting chaos, decentralized networks are quietly fixing actual alignment problems—without begging VCs for survival cash.
Bottom line: Fear sells, but execution wins. And unlike some industries, blockchain doesn’t need doomsday prophecies to justify its existence. (Looking at you, ‘AI safety’ consultancies charging $500/hour to state the obvious.)
Humans Will Adapt with Tech Too
Buterin stressed that the scenario wrongly assumes AI’s growth would outpace human progress. According to him, if nanobots and Dyson swarms become viable by 2030, then scalable human defense will too. Technologies like personalized immune upgrades, real-time environmental scanning, and even robotic body replacements could become common.
Additionally, Buterin stated that cybersecurity has a bright future. Contrary to the common view that digital security is doomed, he claimed defense will eventually outweigh offense. Defensive AI, customized to each individual, can balance out manipulative threats online. These tools, he said, are already taking shape and should be expanded rapidly.
Strategy Must Focus on Defense, Not Just Control
Buterin also was against the notion that there can be one “good AI” to keep the world safe. He advocated for open access to defensive tools, called for transparency in AI labs, and pushed for international agreements on hardware. He cautioned against racing with China or blindly supporting rapid AI development. Instead, he proposed public empowerment with decentralized AI tools and protective measures.
Where Buterin stands shakes up the dialogue on AI safety. Instead of just worrying about misalignment, he thinks we ought to put the innovation side into the mix. His points focus on the view that humans can live through and thrive in a world where super-intelligent AI takes over.
Also Read:
