BTCC / BTCC Square / CryptotimesIO /
OCC Chief Declares: Crypto Firms Deserve Equal Treatment in Bank Charters

OCC Chief Declares: Crypto Firms Deserve Equal Treatment in Bank Charters

Published:
2025-12-09 02:09:30
8
3

Washington's top banking regulator just threw crypto a lifeline—and Wall Street a curveball.

The Level Playing Field Push

The Acting Comptroller of the Currency didn't mince words. His message to traditional finance? Crypto-native companies should get the same shot at federal bank charters as any legacy institution. This isn't about special favors; it's about applying the same rulebook.

Think of it as regulatory arbitrage getting a dose of its own medicine. For years, banks treated crypto like a risky side project. Now, the gatekeeper suggests the disruptors might just get their own keys to the kingdom.

Why This Cuts Through the Noise

This stance bypasses the state-by-state patchwork that has stifled innovation. A federal charter means operational clarity—one set of rules for lending, custody, and payments across all 50 states. It's the infrastructure play crypto has desperately needed.

Suddenly, the path for a crypto firm to operate like a real bank isn't science fiction. It's policy. The subtext is louder than the statement: if you're building legitimate financial infrastructure, you deserve a legitimate framework.

The Finance World's Ironic Twist

Here's the cynical jab for the traditionalists: the same system that created 'too big to fail' is now pondering if algorithmic stability pools deserve a seat at the table. The irony is almost too rich—Wall Street's rulebook might finally legitimize its greatest threat.

The move balances provocation with pragmatism. It doesn't guarantee approval for every DeFi protocol with a whitepaper, but it shreds the notion that crypto is inherently un-bankable. The closer is simple: adapt or get bypassed. The regulatory tide is turning, and it's not waiting for Wall Street's blessing.

Banking system must evolve with technology

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which oversees national banks and federal trust institutions, has historically expressed concerns about crypto-related risks. Today, only two crypto-native firms — Anchorage Digital and Erebor — hold national trust bank charters.

However, Gould emphasized that the broader banking sector is already rapidly modernizing.

He said the financial system has “the capacity to evolve from the telegraph to the blockchain,” warning that restricting new technologies WOULD “undermine the dynamic and evolving nature of the federal banking system.”

A surge in new bank applications

Gould revealed that the agency has received 14 applications to FORM new banks so far this year — nearly matching the number submitted over the previous four years combined. Several of those applicants are digital asset firms or fintech innovators.

“Chartering helps ensure that the banking system continues to keep pace with the evolution of finance and supports our modern economy,” he said. “That is why entities that engage in activities involving digital assets and other novel technologies should have a pathway to become federally supervised banks.”

Traditional banks push back

Financial industry groups, including the American Bankers Association, have urged caution, warning that crypto companies may not meet established standards for fiduciary trust operations. Some have questioned whether the OCC has the resources and expertise to supervise such firms properly.

Gould rejected that view, saying he hears “on a NEAR daily basis” from existing banks about their own blockchain-linked projects. He added that the regulator already has years of supervisory experience with Anchorage, the first crypto-native national trust bank.

“All of this reinforces my confidence in the OCC’s ability to effectively supervise new entrants as well as new activities of existing banks in a fair and even-handed manner,” he said.

Big crypto players seek federal oversight

Several major digital asset companies — including Coinbase, Circle, Ripple, and Paxos — have recently submitted applications for national trust charters.

Such licenses would allow them to expand services under clear regulatory oversight while offering traditional banking-style protections. Coinbase has said it does not plan to become a full-service retail bank, but a federal charter could streamline payments and reduce reliance on partner banks.

Ripple has signaled plans to bring its stablecoin, RLUSD, under federal banking standards if its charter is approved. Circle’s application would enable custody services and bring its dollar-linked operations further under U.S. regulation.

Reviving U.S. banking competition

Gould also stressed the importance of supporting new bank formation in general, particularly after a long stretch following the 2008 financial crisis which few new banks were approved.

He highlighted the OCC’s history of chartering national trust banks, which today are responsible for nearly $2 trillion in assets under custody.

“A robust pipeline of de novo banks,” he argued, is necessary to keep the U.S. banking system dynamic and competitive.

Also Read: Argentina Eyes Rules to Bring Crypto Into Traditional Banks

    

Google News

mobile only image

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.