Tech CEOs Under Fire as Trump Tightens Grip on Private Sector Power

Silicon Valley's elite face unprecedented pressure as regulatory winds shift dramatically.

The Hammer Drops

Washington's new posture puts tech giants in the crosshairs—no more gentle oversight or cozy relationships. The administration's push for control slices through corporate autonomy, forcing executives into uncomfortable compliance dances.

Market Whiplash

Private firms scramble to adapt while investors watch nervously—another reminder that political risk remains the most unpredictable variable in any portfolio. Because nothing says 'stable investment' like waking up to presidential tweets reshaping your entire industry.

Trump pushes deal-making further with defense firms in the crosshairs

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had told CNBC on air that the Pentagon is now actively considering buying equity in America’s largest defense contractors. The remarks came just days after Trump signed off on the Intel purchase.

When asked whether Trump WOULD use the same playbook with other firms, Howard responded, “Oh, there’s a monstrous discussion about defense.”

Howard said companies like Lockheed Martin, which gets most of its revenue from federal contracts, are “basically an arm of the U.S. government.” He said decisions on future equity stakes would rest with the Secretary of Defense and his deputy, but made it clear that Trump is reviewing how America pays for war and weapons.

“I tell you, the way it has been done has been a giveaway,” Howard said, hinting that Trump might completely change how defense budgets are structured and approved by Congress.

Lockheed, the top defense company globally by revenue, issued a statement later saying it is maintaining its partnership with the Trump administration. “As we did in his first term, we are continuing our strong working relationship with President Trump and his Administration to strengthen our national defense,” a Lockheed spokesperson said.

Other major players like RTX, Boeing, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman are all likely to be part of Trump’s deeper push into direct state involvement with military contractors.

Tech CEOs pressured as Trump tightens grip on private firms

Multiple executives say Trump met privately with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in the weeks leading up to both deals. Several Intel officials have openly said they were uncomfortable with the president’s involvement.

At first, Trump wanted Lip-Bu fired before he eventually agreed to the government stake. This kind of pressure has defined Trump’s second term: assert control, cut checks, and call the shots, publicly or privately.

But Trump is unbothered by the backlash. He told reporters recently, “I would make these kinds of deals all day long.” His plan seems to be more of the same; identify key companies, buy big, and use government influence to boost outcomes.

But critics are now sounding alarms over what they see as political interference in public markets. Cato Institute economist Scott Lincicome, writing in the Washington Post, said, “The most immediate risk is that Intel’s decisions will increasingly be driven by political rather than commercial considerations.”

Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky posted on X, “If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn’t the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?”

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today