Markets Sound Alarm: Fed Balance Sheet Cuts Could Derail Trump’s Rate Ambitions

The Federal Reserve's quantitative tightening is on a collision course with presidential policy goals.

The Great Unwind vs. The Great Promise

Wall Street's whispering a dangerous truth: the Fed's methodical shrinking of its multi-trillion-dollar balance sheet—the so-called 'Great Unwind'—is quietly building a wall of its own. It's a wall of tightening financial conditions that could block Trump's push for lower interest rates. The central bank's balance sheet cuts drain liquidity from the system, a direct counterforce to any political pressure for cheaper money.

Mechanics of a Monetary Standoff

Think of it as two giants pulling on the same rope. On one end, the executive branch wants growth-fueling, business-friendly rates. On the other, the supposedly independent Fed is mechanically pulling cash out of the banking system by letting assets roll off its books. This isn't about a rate hike announcement; it's the silent, automated tightening happening in the background every month. Markets are pricing in the friction—the volatility, the liquidity crunches, the sudden spikes in funding costs that make a mockery of any 'low-rate' promise.

Who Blinks First?

The stage is set for a historic clash of mandates. The Fed's dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment versus the political imperative for a roaring economy. History suggests the Fed's balance sheet is its most potent, and least understood, tool. A president can jawbone rates, but he can't stop the quantitative tightening machine once it's in motion—unless he wants to spark a crisis of confidence that would make his Wall Street donors blanch. It's the ultimate test of central bank independence in the modern era.

One thing's certain: the market hates uncertainty more than it hates high rates. And right now, it's getting a double dose of both—courtesy of the world's most expensive tug-of-war. Somewhere, a bond trader is muttering, 'This is why we can't have nice things.'

Markets react to balance sheet concerns

The market response points to an early reading of Warsh’s past statements. He’s criticized the Fed for buying too many bonds during the 2008 financial crisis, when he worked as a Fed governor, and then again during the 2020 pandemic response.

Greg Peters works as co-chief investment officer at PGIM fixed income. He explained what’s got the market worried. “You have an anti-balance sheet expansion guy against a backdrop of wanting lower interest rates. It’s a tension point. That’s what the market is focused on. That’s why the curve is steepening out,” Peters said.

Warsh spent five years at the Fed from 2006 to 2011. Since leaving, he’s spoken out against some of the central bank’s major policy moves. The rounds of bond buying that left the Fed holding close to $9tn in Treasury bonds and other securities at the highest point? He takes particular issue with those.

His argument is that keeping such a large balance sheet warps the prices of investments and might lock in higher inflation over time. But at the same time, he’s said the economy faces risks that support cutting the Fed’s main interest rate.

Warsh addressed the Fed’s role in debt markets during an April speech that drew wide attention. “The Fed has been the most important buyer of US Treasury debt, and other liabilities backed by the US government, since 2008,” he said. He added that “it’s a proxy for the Fed’s growing imprimatur on the economy.”

Stanley Druckenmiller, a billionaire investor who’s advised Warsh for years, told the Financial Times on Friday that his protégé does not stick to one position. “I’ve seen him go both ways” on monetary policy, Druckenmiller said. Warsh is not permanently hawkish on rates, the investor suggested.

Some market watchers think Warsh might push to cut short-term rates. “ Their reasoning is based on expectations that artificial intelligence will boost productivity. Under this view, the economy could expand quickly without creating much inflation.

Challenges of balancing competing priorities

The Fed lowered rates by 0.75 percentage points last year. But earlier this week, officials signaled they plan to pause cuts for now. They pointed to solid economic growth and a job market that appears steadier after showing some weakness.

Markets still expect two quarter-point cuts starting this summer after Warsh’s nomination. This shows traders have not changed their near-term Fed outlook.

Bill Campbell manages portfolios at DoubleLine. He pointed out the challenge if Warsh wants both lower short-term rates and a smaller balance sheet while government debt grows and inflation stays elevated. “Until you get fiscal under control and inflation under control, you are not going to be able to aggressively reduce interest rates and shrink the [Fed’s] balance sheet,” Campbell said. He added that “I believe Kevin Warsh fully understands this.”

The Fed stopped its program to shrink its balance sheet late last year. Officials worried about drying up cash in overnight lending markets. This decision eased some concerns about who will buy all the government debt, especially as analysts predicted the central bank might start expanding its bond holdings again.

Mark Dowding runs active fixed income at RBC BlueBay Asset Management. He described the problem with using balance sheet cuts to justify rate reductions. “The issue is if you justify rate cuts by cutting the balance sheet, this does nothing to help lower long-term rates and improve mortgage affordability, which is what TRUMP wants,” Dowding said.

The competing priorities create uncertainty about how Warsh WOULD balance the administration’s political goals with his stated policy preferences if confirmed to lead the central bank.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.