Meta’s Asia-Pacific Policy Chief Exits - What’s Next for the Tech Giant’s Regional Strategy?

Meta's top public policy leader for Asia-Pacific has left the company, throwing the social media giant's regional regulatory strategy into uncertainty.

Leadership vacuum hits at critical moment

The departure creates immediate questions about who will navigate Meta's complex relationships with governments across the region—from India's data localization demands to Australia's news media bargaining code and Southeast Asia's evolving digital governance frameworks.

Regulatory storms brewing across APAC

Without seasoned leadership, Meta faces mounting pressure on multiple fronts: content moderation battles, data privacy regulations, and antitrust scrutiny are intensifying across nearly every major market in the region.

Timing couldn't be worse

The exit comes as Meta prepares to launch its metaverse ambitions in markets with vastly different approaches to virtual worlds—some welcoming, others restrictive. The policy vacuum leaves the company vulnerable to reactive rather than proactive engagement.

What's the real cost?

While Meta's stock might shrug off another executive departure—after all, what's one more head rolling in tech these days?—the regulatory missteps that could follow might just make those metaverse development costs look like pocket change.

Meta is losing a senior policy leader amid increased pressure from governments

Milner has been in charge of Meta’s public strategy across major territories, including China, India, and Japan, areas marked by large populations and steady expansion plans.

As Meta grows further into those markets, oversight shifts toward teams dedicated to rules and compliance, tasked not only with spotting risks but also maintaining working relationships with government officials. Since clarity is rare in such environments, Milner’s role has become a vital force in shifting political landscapes.

Now that regulators are watching Meta more closely, Milner’s role carries greater consequences. As governments zero in on child protection, online scams, and how content is policed, what counts as acceptable changes slowly. In moments like these, people guiding policy inside the company help steer choices, not just reading rules, but nudging features, shaping talks with watchdogs, and adjusting plans when fresh laws land.

His departure at this time makes steady leadership harder, right when ties to policymakers are at their peak.

Over many years, working in multiple regions has shaped Milner’s standing within the organization, which is also why Meta is carefully managing his transition. Before leading policy efforts in Asia-Pacific, he served as Meta’s head of policy in the United Kingdom and Ireland; after that, he oversaw policy across Europe, parts of Africa, and the Middle East.

That exposure allowed him to understand how different governments approached oversight and how quickly laws can change. When sharing news of his departure on LinkedIn, Milner said his involvement over the coming months WOULD focus on finding his successor and on keeping the APAC policy team stable amid ongoing scrutiny of the firm.

Governments across the Asia-Pacific are tightening social media rules

Across the Asia-Pacific region, regulators are increasing pressure on Meta, not just in individual nations but through coordinated efforts spanning multiple jurisdictions. At the heart of Meta’s policy direction in key territories like China, India, and Japan stood Simon Milner, shaping engagement where youthful, digitally active populations shape future ambitions.

Growth initiatives in these regions require careful navigation through changing legal frameworks that evolve faster than corporate timelines allow. In this space, public policy teams play vital roles: interpreting regulations, clarifying platform mechanics for authorities, and detecting signals before they harden into conflict.

Increased oversight has made Meta’s obligations harder to manage. As authorities now question corporate practices even more, expectations have changed a lot. Attention now focuses on concrete issues like digital deception and safeguarding individuals online.

A turning point came in Taiwan when leading financial firms halted promotions on Facebook. Fraudulent posts had mimicked official branding, causing confusion among customers.

The MOVE intensified government attention toward the platform while revealing vulnerabilities in enforcement mechanisms. Loss of advertiser confidence highlighted consequences beyond regulatory oversight, putting the company’s reputation and income at risk. The public examination left little room for the company to react.

The same kind of pressure happened in Japan, with legislators adopting a firmer stance. Public statements from authorities have called on Meta to swiftly remove deceptive advertisements featuring celebrities, reflecting dissatisfaction with perceived delays in the company’s enforcement actions.

What underlies these requests is a growing pattern across the region. Officials now anticipate intervention before widespread impact, rather than waiting until consequences emerge.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.