Trove’s Alleged Rug Pull Sparks Class Action Firestorm - Investors Demand Answers

Another day, another crypto project facing the music. This time, it's Trove in the hot seat.

The Backstory: Promises vs. Reality

Whispers turned to shouts as the Trove platform—once touted as a revolutionary DeFi gateway—went silent. User funds reportedly vanished into the digital ether. The classic rug pull playbook: hype the project, attract liquidity, then pull the floor out from under everyone. Now, a growing chorus of investors isn't just complaining on social media; they're organizing. Class action calls are gaining serious momentum, with legal teams circling.

The Legal Chessboard

It's the Wild West meets the courtroom. Proving fraudulent intent in a decentralized, often anonymous landscape is a lawyer's nightmare and a speculator's recurring anxiety. Plaintiffs will need to trace the blockchain breadcrumbs, hoping to pin the disappearance on identifiable actors behind the project. Regulatory bodies are watching closely—another potential black eye for an industry still begging for mainstream trust.

Investor Fallout: Trust Is the First Casualty

The immediate damage is financial, but the long-term wound is to credibility. Every alleged rug pull makes institutional players more skittish and reinforces the 'crypto casino' narrative that veterans have fought to shed. Due diligence is preached, but when the house can disappear with the chips, what's the point? It’s the age-old finance story: high returns often come with even higher risks, and sometimes, with an exit scam dressed up as innovation.

Where Does This Leave DeFi?

Transparency and accountability aren't just buzzwords; they're the bedrock. Incidents like the Trove situation force a harsh spotlight on governance, code audits, and the real meaning of 'decentralization.' The community's response—moving toward collective legal action—shows a maturation, a refusal to just 'take the L.' They're fighting back with the only tool left when the smart contract fails: the actual contract of law.

One cynical finance jab? It's the ultimate liquidity event—just not the one investors signed up for. The only thing that got 'mooned' was their capital, straight into oblivion.

Trove markets’ fully diluted volume dropped to $1 million

Hyperliquid community members are accusing Trove of deliberately delaying refunds while preparing a Solana-based launch that would allow them to retain all funds raised during the ICO. 

Its project backers tried to build credibility on Hyperliquid by acquiring 500,000 HYPE tokens and promising to use HIP-3. However, per blockchain data from Hyperscan, they began dumping the coins on Monday ahead of Trove’s launch on Solana.

When the TROVE token went live on solana about 30 minutes before this publication, its fully diluted volume plunged from $20 million to a meagre $1 million. According to traders tracking the launch, the blockchain switch prevented Hyperliquid investors who had suspected a rug pull from pulling out any of their funds. 

“My $20,000 investment with 9+ mil committed should have resulted in $14k USDC back and $6k in $TROVE. Due to the token GIGA nuking, they gave me in total….$600 back,” complained one investor.

Moreover, there were allegations that Trove secretly paid crypto influencers to promote the ICO, who did not publicly disclose that they had been hired for the promotion. The Hyperliquid Daily X account specifically mentioned user @waleswoosh supposedly received $8,000 to promote the Trove ICO, citing blockchain investigator ZachXBT. 

Other influencers who were part of a Trove X space during the ICO, seen in a screenshot shared by 0xFinance, had purportedly placed the TROVE logo in their usernames in exchange for monthly payments of $5,000. This is, along with the privilege of purchasing tokens at half the price offered to the public.

These are all the people responsible for making a scam project look legitimate for few thousand dollars. Never forget them.$Trove $HYPE pic.twitter.com/GF6cbUofsC

— 0xfinance (@0xfinance) January 19, 2026

Responding to Trove Market’s post about its MOVE to Solana, ZachXBT asked the social media account about his findings showing funds being diverted to platforms.

“Want to explain to the community why your team bridged $45K from the Trove Angel Round raise on Jan 11 and deposited it directly into a casino deposit address?” the investigator asked.

He included transaction details listing the source and destination addresses for a casino deposit. In response, the Trove team reportedly suggested that the casino transfers might have been carried out by @_TJRTrades, a crypto personality known for gambling-related content. 

Naysayers rejected the explanation, noting that the same account had previously posted an overt promotion encouraging followers to buy the TROVE token.

“What’s really messed up is that this KOL didn’t even add an ad tag or warn users. Taking ads isn’t wrong, but if you don’t disclose it, it’s easy to overhype and cause the community to lose money. Especially investing in projects like TROVE,” wrote the Hyperliquid News account.

Crypto influencer pleads innocence, says Trove broke its promises

Meteversejoji, the username of one of the influencers seen on 0xFinance’s snapshot, posted a statement describing how he got in bed with Trove months before launch. He claimed that his team had invested in the project in October, and none of the advisors he was in communication with were informed about the change to Solana.

According to Joji, when he requested a refund days before launch, he was told he would be made whole at the token generation event, even though the team had already spent much of the raised capital.

“I honestly didn’t DD this enough, as I saw a board of big guys and just thought that would be enough + investing in this while on vacation and not really giving a f*** about who was behind it was pretty retarded. I’m sorry if I made you buy this, at least know I got scammed too,” Joji concluded.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.