Intel’s Bold Bet: Doubling Down on Speed & Battery Life Over AI Hype in Laptop Market

Forget the AI arms race—Intel's making a different play. While competitors cram neural processors into every chassis, the chip giant is steering its laptop strategy toward a simpler, perhaps more primal, user demand: raw speed that lasts.
The Core Conundrum
It's a contrarian move in an industry obsessed with 'AI-powered' everything. Marketing decks across Silicon Valley are saturated with promises of automated photo editing and real-time translation. Intel's latest roadmap, however, whispers a different priority. The focus? Maximizing clock speeds and stretching battery cycles to their absolute limit.
Performance as the Ultimate Feature
The logic is starkly pragmatic. AI features often live behind subscription paywalls or require constant cloud connectivity—a battery-draining, privacy-questioning proposition. Intel's bet is that users still value instantaneous application launches, buttery-smooth multitasking, and the freedom to work unplugged for a full workday more than they value gimmicky algorithms. It's a back-to-basics approach that prioritizes the tangible over the speculative.
The Market's Verdict
Will it work? The financial analysts are already skeptical, muttering about 'missed paradigm shifts' and 'late-mover disadvantages'—as if chasing every hype cycle has ever been a guaranteed path to profitability. The real test will be in the coffee shops and airport lounges. When the choice is between a laptop that boasts an AI-assisted spreadsheet and one that simply won't die during a cross-country flight, the silent majority might just vote with their wallets for endurance.
In a world racing toward an AI-everything future, Intel's gamble is a refreshing, if risky, reminder: sometimes the best innovation is just making the fundamentals exceptionally good. After all, you can't use any AI feature if your laptop is dead—a truth no venture capital pitch can bypass.
Battery performance beats Apple’s offerings
These chips matter for Intel because they’re the first built with the company’s 18A technology that took years to develop. Laptops with these processors should run for up to 27 hours on one charge. That’s a big jump from older Intel chips and better than what Apple offers right now. The MacBook Air gets 18 hours, and the MacBook Pro manages up to 24 hours.
Microsoft’s Pavan Davuluri, president of Windows and devices, talked to Yahoo Finance at the show. “I think the fundamental thing is these are going to be faster, more responsive PCs with better value,” he said.
Intel did bring up AI when talking about the new chips, but the company clearly decided to focus on things regular shoppers actually care about when buying a laptop.
Forrester senior analyst Alvin Nguyen explained why this makes sense. “You communicate with what people understand, what they’re familiar with,” he told Yahoo Finance. “You won’t go wrong if you can say it’s … faster, it’s got better battery life, plus it has AI … I think that’d be a great message.”
This launch means a lot for Intel as it tries to turn things around. Jim Johnson is senior vice president and general manager of Intel’s client computing group. He said the company feels good about the manufacturing behind these chips.
“We absolutely have confidence the 18A ramp will prove this,” Johnson said. “But we’re not going to promise it. We’re just going to do it. Just have it happen. Let’s go do it. We’re launching wafers like you wouldn’t believe … we have two [factories] running 18A, and demand is high.”
Gaming performance shows real improvement
These processors are really important for Intel. The company lost customers to Advanced Micro Devices over the past few years because of mistakes Intel made. The Core Ultra Series 3 is Intel’s biggest attempt to win back trust from regular people and businesses by making chips that work well without killing the battery.
Testing out laptops with the new chips at Intel’s booth showed what they can do. Several machines ran big games like “Battlefield 6.” Some laptops had separate Nvidia graphics cards, but others just used the graphics built into the Series 3 chips. Both types handled the games without problems.
This is actually pretty surprising. For years, the graphics built into processors haven’t been good enough for serious gaming. You could start a game, but you’d have to turn down all the settings so much that it looked terrible. The CORE Ultra Series 3 ran several games smoothly, which is a real change.
Intel has tough competition though. AMD released new laptop chips at CES too, and Qualcomm showed off a new chip as it tries to get into the PC market.
AMD CEO Lisa Su talked about her plans during the company’s meeting with financial analysts in New York City in November. She said AMD expects to take up to 40% of PC market revenue in the next three to five years. That’s double the 20% revenue share AMD had in 2025.
Intel needs to stop that from happening. The company’s newest chips might be what it takes to hold onto its customers.
If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.