Crypto Whale Bleeds $27.3M in Suspected Hack — A Stark Reminder of Digital Asset Vulnerabilities
A single transaction siphoned millions from a major crypto holder this week, spotlighting the persistent security gaps even the wealthiest investors face.
The Mechanics of a Modern Heist
While details remain scarce, the incident follows a familiar pattern: unauthorized access, swift asset movement, and a trail left on an immutable ledger for all to see—except, of course, for the victim. The $27.3 million figure isn't just a loss; it's a price tag for overconfidence in self-custody, a lesson delivered by an anonymous counterparty.
Security Theater in a Trustless World
The promise of decentralization comes with the burden of personal responsibility. There's no customer service hotline, no fraud department to file a claim with—just cold, hard code and the hope your private keys stay private. This hack cuts through the noise of bullish price predictions, serving a brutal reminder that your portfolio is only as strong as its weakest security link.
The Aftermath and the Unanswered Questions
Investigations will likely point to a compromised seed phrase or a sophisticated smart contract exploit. Exchanges may freeze the stolen funds if they flow through identifiable addresses, but recovery is a long shot. For the broader market, it's a blip; for the whale, a life-altering financial event. It underscores a cynical truth in finance: the market doesn't care about your losses, it just absorbs the liquidity and moves on.
Every major hack reinforces the same lesson—the technology is revolutionary, but the human element remains the greatest vulnerability. Until that gap closes, stories like this will keep repeating, providing endless fodder for regulators and a sobering counter-narrative to the 'number go up' crowd. The ledger never lies, and today, it's telling a $27.3 million cautionary tale.
Multisig wallet hacker still holds $2 million of the stolen funds
According to PeckShield, the attacker, who is using the address 0x1fCf…367d23Ac, has already laundered about $12.6 million, equivalent to 4,100 Ether, through Tornado Cash. The security firm added that the drainer still holds around $2 million in liquid assets, based on wallet balances observed at the time of reporting.
Several security analysts believe the attacker is in control of the victim’s multisig wallet, which is actively holding a large leveraged position on Aave. The wallet reportedly has about $25 million worth of Ether supplied as collateral against roughly $12.3 million borrowed in DAI.
The attacker’s address, which PeckShield shared publicly, holds Ether, Wrapped Ether, OKB, Trust Wallet Token, Bitfinex LEO, Fetch, and Nexo. They have so far made deposits of stolen Ether into Tornado Cash in equal-sized batches totaling 4,100 Ether, split into 41 transactions of 100 Ether each.
Late Wednesday, on-chain investigator Specter issued more details on the breach by publishing a breakdown of the attack sequence. The blockchain analyst mentioned that a victim’s private key compromise had pushed the total losses from the incident closer to $38 million.
According to Specter, the victim created a multisignature wallet configured as a 1-of-1 system on April 11, 2025, at 07:48:11. Shortly after moving funds into the wallet, the main wallet, designated as the signer, experienced a massive outflow at 08:23:23.
While the precise cause of the breach remains unclear, Specter suggested that the private key may have been leaked during the multisignature setup process. Another possibility raised was that the victim relied on a malicious actor for assistance while creating the multisig wallet.
Whale 0xde5f44…b051e965 had suffered notable losses in May, per the tracking of analytics platform Onchainlens, which found that the investor withdrew 2,520.5 Ether, valued at about $4.52 million at the time, from OKX and staked it with Kiln Finance.
Over the course of the year, the whale reportedly staked a total of 9,918 Ether, worth $22.58 million at around July. Despite earning 105.5 Ether in staking rewards, the investor still faced a net loss of around $4.26 million before the latest exploit occurred.
Multisig wallets can be hacked without the necessary signatory threshold
Most members of the crypto community believe in multisig wallets security because they require approvals from two or more entities before executing a transaction. Some configurations in these types of wallets include systems like 2-of-3 or 3-of-5, where the first number in the system represents the keyholder threshold that must approve a swap or trade.
However, configurations such as 1-of-1, where only one signer is required, undermine the primary benefit of multisignature protection. In such cases, the compromise of a single key can lead to total loss, as appears to have happened in whale 0xde5f44…b051e965’s case.
In a separate case seen in September this year, an unidentified crypto investor lost over $3 million after unknowingly authorizing a malicious contract. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged that incident on his Telegram channel, revealing that the victim’s wallet was drained of $3.047 million in USDC and swapped for Ether to be routed through Tornado Cash.
SlowMist founder Yu Xian later explained that the compromised address in that case was a 2-of-4 SAFE multisig wallet. He continued to say the fraudulent contract mimicked the first and last characters of the real address, making the deception difficult to detect.
The attacker also exploited the Safe Multi Send mechanism, hiding the malicious approval inside a routine authorization. “This abnormal authorization was hard to detect because it wasn’t a standard approval,” Xian wrote on X.
Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts
