Meta Shifts China Strategy: Enforcement Pivot Signals New Digital Frontier

Meta's China playbook just got a rewrite—and the implications ripple far beyond social media.

The tech giant is quietly recalibrating its enforcement mechanisms for one of the world's most complex digital markets. This isn't about pulling back; it's a strategic repositioning for the next phase of global tech influence.

Decoding the Strategic Shift

Forget simple compliance tweaks. This move signals a deeper adaptation to China's unique digital ecosystem. Meta isn't just following rules—it's redesigning its rulebook to navigate the Great Firewall's shadow economy and the parallel internet thriving within it.

The adjustment touches everything from content moderation algorithms to ad policy enforcement. It's a recognition that Western platform norms don't translate directly to China's hybrid digital landscape, where state directives and entrepreneurial hustle coexist in constant tension.

The Web3 Connection Wall Street Misses

Here's what finance analysts tracking traditional tech stocks are overlooking: Meta's China maneuver mirrors the strategic flexibility native to crypto projects. Decentralized protocols constantly adapt governance and tokenomics to local regulations—from Singapore's sandbox to Dubai's virtual asset laws—without compromising core infrastructure.

Meta's pivot demonstrates this same blockchain-inspired agility. They're not abandoning principles but implementing layered enforcement—a concept any DeFi protocol navigating multiple jurisdictions understands intimately. Meanwhile, traditional funds remain obsessed with quarterly ad revenue, missing the structural bet being placed here.

The New Enforcement Calculus

This isn't surrender—it's sophisticated gamesmanship. By adjusting enforcement, Meta gains precious operational intelligence about China's evolving digital borders. That intelligence becomes strategic currency, potentially more valuable than immediate market access.

Every policy exception carved out, every localized moderation tool developed, creates data points about how China's digital sovereignty expands and contracts. In the arms race between platform governance and state control, that intelligence is the ultimate insider token.

Meta just placed a long-dated option on China's digital future—and Wall Street's still pricing yesterday's advertising warrants. Some things never change, even when everything else does.

Meta is changing its enforcement approach on China

Meta created a new anti-fraud team in 2024 to deal with the mess, as staff cut the share of banned China ads from 19% to 9% in the second half of the year. That MOVE did not last.

After what internal files described as “follow-up from Zuck,” Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told teams to pause the crackdown. The company then disbanded the China task force, lifted a freeze on approving new Chinese ad agencies and shelved several enforcement steps that tests had shown WOULD work.

Consultants from Propellerfish also told Meta its own policies were helping scammers. Still, within months, new Chinese agencies were back flooding the system.

By mid-2025, banned ads hit 16% of China’s revenue again. Former Meta integrity chief Rob Leathern said, “The levels that you’re talking about are not defensible. I don’t know how anyone could think this is okay.”

Spokesperson Andy Stone told Reuters that the fraud team was always temporary and that Zuckerberg ordered teams to “redouble efforts” worldwide. Stone said Meta’s automated tools blocked or removed 46 million China-submitted ads over 18 months and that Meta had cut ties with some Chinese partners and lowered commissions for others who pushed too many violations.

He added, “Scams are spiking across the internet, driven by persistent criminals and sophisticated, organized crime syndicates constantly evolving their schemes to evade detection.”

Chinese ad networks drive global scams on Meta

Reuters says that Meta expected $16 billion of its 2024 revenue to come from scam and banned ads. Two U.S. senators later asked regulators to investigate. Inside the company, China was labeled the top “Scam Exporting Nation.” Staff even noted that global scam rates drop during China’s “Golden Week” holiday.

U.S. prosecutors in Illinois said in March 2025 that the FBI seized $214 million from a Chinese stock scheme that used Meta ads to funnel victims into WhatsApp groups run by people “posing as U.S.-based investment advisors.” Seven people from Taiwan and Malaysia were charged.

A big part of the problem is Meta’s China reseller network: 11 top-tier agencies that recruit smaller agencies, creating layers of intermediaries.

A Propellerfish report claims that there is widespread fake accounts, identity-masking tools, AI-generated documents, and “ad optimization specialists” funded by informal lenders. The report said China’s government does not intervene “when violations target overseas audiences,” meaning fraudsters face “little or no risk.”

Meta’s enforcement was described as weaker than TikTok and Google. Internal files said Meta would not aim for full parity with global standards but would instead maintain its current level of “global harm” from China.

For under $30, paid in crypto, they bought access to accounts from second-tier agencies linked to top partners like GatherOne and Cheetah Mobile. They then placed get-rich-quick investment ads, which ran with no resistance and drew dozens of responses. After questions, Meta removed its public directory of “Badged Partners.”

Internal data said China ad revenue more than doubled from $7.4 billion in 2022 to $18.4 billion in 2024. By late 2024, half of the $240 million coming from newly verified Chinese resellers violated rules. Staff built dashboards and resumed a moratorium on new verifications.

Meta also found that more than half of ads run by Beijing Tengze Technology broke its rules. Instead of cutting the company, Meta charged it more. Chinese records later showed Tengze shut down, and its listed address did not exist. Its owner, Lin Zedun, also controls Shenzhen Fugaoda, which had vanished from its office after missed rent but later posted job ads for people with experience selling “small black goods” in Europe and America.

In early 2025, Meta adjusted commissions for Chinese agencies based on ad quality. But behavior did not change. A May 2025 review showed 800 accounts generated $28 million in violating ads in one month. More than 75% of spending came from accounts backed by partner protections. One worker asked whether Meta planned to penalize high-spending partners. Another answered no because “the revenue impact is too high.”

Staff proposed shutting down a small group of accounts responsible for $2.8 million in harmful ads each month.

Before doing so, they asked if growth teams would object “given the revenue impact.” The internal document ended with a blunt line: “It’s likely the revenue will return.”

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today