BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptopolitan /
Japan Shifts Crypto Oversight to Securities Law in Major Regulatory Overhaul

Japan Shifts Crypto Oversight to Securities Law in Major Regulatory Overhaul

Published:
2025-12-10 16:31:45
14
3

Japan moves to shift crypto oversight to securities law in major regulatory overhaul

Japan just rewrote the rulebook for crypto—and the global market is watching.

The Financial Services Agency (FSA) is pulling digital assets out of the regulatory gray zone and slapping them under the same securities law that governs stocks and bonds. This isn't a tweak; it's a tectonic shift for one of the world's largest economies.

From Fringe to Mainstream

For years, crypto operated in a special category with its own bespoke rules. That era is over. The move signals that regulators now see most digital tokens not as novel tech toys, but as financial instruments—plain and simple. Expect stricter disclosure requirements, tighter custody rules, and a compliance burden that will separate the serious players from the fly-by-night operations.

The Global Domino Effect

Japan's pivot doesn't happen in a vacuum. It throws down a gauntlet for other major economies still dithering over how to handle crypto. The message is clear: treat it like a security, or risk creating a loophole big enough to drive a digital truck through. Watch for other G7 nations to follow suit, creating a new, more rigid global framework.

For investors, this brings long-awaited legitimacy but also a dose of cold, hard reality. The wild west days are closing. The new regime promises more protection but also less freedom—a classic trade-off that tends to make financiers rich and innovators sigh. After all, nothing tames a disruptive technology faster than fitting it into a centuries-old regulatory box.

Japan joins Europe and South Korea in terms of oversight

To date, Japanese authorities have primarily viewed cryptocurrencies as a means for sending and storing value. That approach placed them under the Payment Services Act, aligning digital assets with electronic money services. 

However, the new report from the FSA says that crypto should operate far more like an investment product than a medium of exchange.

A significant aspect of the proposed framework is how exchanges manage token launches. For initial exchange offerings, Japan seeks standardized disclosures that require companies to provide specific information about the teams behind them, explain their supply structures, and present third-party code audits.

In short, when crypto companies want to sell tokens, they must follow the rules for public-market listings instead of using lightweight token sales. “Crypto transactions conducted by users are similar to securities transactions, and may involve the sale of new crypto assets or the buying and selling already in circulation,” the report reads.

Japan also wants to be able to shut down unlicensed platforms more easily, including overseas exchanges and decentralized operators that serve Japanese users without authorization. There will also be rules about insider trading in crypto markets, which WOULD make Japan similar to Europe and South Korea in terms of oversight.

Additionally, the change makes the developers who created the project responsible, which takes away one of the key selling points that many autonomous projects use for their privacy. This is regardless of whether the project is decentralized.

This MOVE follows the Japanese government’s consideration of plans to reduce the maximum tax rate on crypto profits by imposing a flat rate of 20% on all gains from crypto trading. As reported by Cryptopolitan, the proposal places crypto profits under a different taxation framework, where specific income-generating streams are treated independently from business earnings or wages.

Japan bans crypto ETF-linked CFD trading without local approval

Japan’s Financial Services Agency sent a  message to the market, saying offering derivatives tied to overseas crypto ETFs is “not desirable.” The update came through a revised regulatory Q&A released this week. 

They cited the reason that Japan has not yet approved spot crypto ETFs. As a result, regulators argue that the investor protection framework remains incomplete. To that end, they do not want foreign ETF-linked products entering the local market through side doors. 

This decision directly affects contracts for difference, or CFDs. These products enable traders to bet on price movements without owning the underlying asset. In this case, the underlying assets were US-listed Bitcoin ETFs, such as BlackRock’s IBIT. Once the guidance went public, IG Securities announced it would stop offering these ETF-linked crypto CFDs in Japan.

According to the agency, even if the ETF is listed overseas, its price still tracks the spot price of crypto. That makes any linked CFD, in practice, a crypto derivative. Under Japan’s Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, that puts these products in a high-risk category. The regulator also flagged weak risk disclosure.

Lawmakers still view crypto price swings as a threat to retail investors. They worry about leverage, fast liquidations, and sudden losses. CFDs amplify all three with global ETF exposure on top; the risks grow even faster. On the other side of the world, the US market races ahead with spot bitcoin ETFs. 

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.