Washington and Canberra Forge $8.5 Billion Alliance to Challenge China’s Mineral Monopoly

The Great Mineral Game Just Got Real

Strategic Move Against Supply Chain Dominance

Washington and Canberra just dropped an $8.5 billion counterpunch against China's mineral stranglehold. This isn't just another trade agreement—it's a direct challenge to Beijing's control over critical resources that power everything from smartphones to electric vehicles.

Building Alternative Supply Chains

The pact targets rare earth minerals and other strategic resources where China currently holds overwhelming market dominance. Both nations are mobilizing resources to develop independent supply chains that bypass traditional routes controlled by Beijing.

Geopolitical Chess in the Resource Sector

This massive investment signals a fundamental shift in how Western nations approach resource security. Instead of relying on diplomatic negotiations, they're putting real capital behind creating viable alternatives to Chinese-controlled supply networks.

Market Implications and Future Projections

The $8.5 billion commitment represents one of the largest coordinated efforts to break China's mineral monopoly. It's either a brilliant strategic move or the most expensive geopolitical statement since someone decided gold-backed currency was outdated—either way, the resource wars just escalated dramatically.

Washington puts cash behind Alcoa’s gallium plant in Western Australia

One of the top priorities under the agreement is a gallium recovery project being developed by Alcoa in Western Australia.

The U.S. government will take an equity stake in the facility, making it one of two focus projects under the deal. Alcoa, which is listed on the NYSE and also traded on the Australian Securities Exchange, saw its stock rally nearly 10% after the announcement.

These minerals aren’t optional. They are used in electric cars, missiles, telecom gear, and other high-tech equipment. China, which produces the bulk of the world’s supply, has been tightening export controls during its ongoing trade war with Washington.

This latest clampdown triggered the rush to secure alternative supply lines, with both TRUMP and Albanese agreeing that domestic and allied production needs to ramp up fast.

Albanese said both countries will put in $1 billion each over the next six months to support shovel-ready projects.

A WHITE House fact sheet, though, later said that the actual combined investment will total more than $3 billion within that same time frame. The agreement was described as a “framework” for long-term joint mineral development.

US Export-Import Bank issues $2.2 billion to boost financing pipeline

To keep money flowing into the pipeline, the Export-Import Bank of the United States will issue seven letters of interest covering more than $2.2 billion in financing. That could unlock up to $5 billion in total project investments.

These funds are intended to fast-track mining and processing operations both in Australia and across trusted partners.

Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council, told reporters on Monday that China’s export policy created a supply chain risk that needed immediate attention.

“Australia is really, really going to be helpful in the effort to take the global economy and make it less risky, less exposed to the kind of rare earth extortion that we’re seeing from the Chinese,” Hassett said during a briefing before the Trump–Albanese meeting.

Hassett also called Australia one of the most important players in the space due to its extensive reserves and refining capacity. With Albanese were top officials overseeing resources, industry, and science, underlining how coordinated this effort is across sectors in Canberra.

But this isn’t a silver bullet. Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the scale and speed of investment are unusual.

“The US and Australia will invest over $3bn (€2.6bn) in joint critical minerals projects within six months. That’s a somewhat unprecedented speed of capital injection,” she said.

Still, Gracelin cautioned that Australia alone won’t be able to meet all of America’s needs and that Washington must keep funding more projects at home and with other friendly governments.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.