ChatGPT’s Crypto Post Ignites Regulatory Firestorm—Who’s Watching the Algorithms?
AI-generated content just threw gasoline on the crypto oversight debate. When a ChatGPT story post went viral—skirting financial disclosures and pumping tokens with machine-written hype—regulators scrambled. ’Unregistered investment advice’ or just another Tuesday in DeFi? Either way, it’s a wake-up call.
Wall Street’s compliance officers are sweating bullets. If a bot can move markets without a Series 7 license, what’s next? Meanwhile, crypto degens are already training LLMs to write shill threads. The SEC’s response? Probably another 3-year ’working group.’
Here’s the kicker: the same banks crying foul today will be selling ’AI-powered crypto strategies’ by Q3. Some things never change—only the suckers do.
In brief
- On May 8, 2025, an Instagram story posted by the official ChatGPT account shared a link to a Pump.fun contract.
- The token in question was launched just about an hour before the post, according to CoinMarketCap.
- Several scenarios are considered : hacking, human error, or an uncontrolled operation.
- The crypto community awaits clear answers on this event that sowed doubt in the ecosystem.
A Pump.fun contract shared from the official ChatGPT account
On May 8, 2025 at 7:52 PM (Paris time), CoinMarketCap issued a brief alert on the X platform :
The official ChatGPT Instagram account posted a pump(.)fun contract address in its stories. The token in question was launched about an hour before the post.
This message, sober and direct, states that the official ChatGPT account (belonging to OpenAI) relayed in its Instagram story a contract from the Pump.fun platform, just about an hour after the launch of the concerned token. No official OpenAI statement has, for now, clarified this unexpected publication.
The temporal coincidence—story broadcast and recent token creation—immediately caught attention. Several objective points are to be noted at this stage:
- The message was broadcast via the official ChatGPT Instagram account, a recognized public channel ;
- The mentioned Pump.fun token is said to have been created about an hour before the publication ;
- The crypto platform Pump.fun allows easy creation of tokens without quality control or technical audits ;
- At this stage, no signal makes it possible to know whether the publication was intentional, automated, hacked, or fraudulent ;
- No official reaction from OpenAI or Meta (Instagram) has been recorded at the time of writing.
Faced with this silence, the crypto community wonders. Internal leak, poorly controlled test, diverted access : the absence of denial as well as confirmation casts a shadow on the real intentions behind this story. Above all, it highlights the systemic risks caused today by the amplification of unchecked content on platforms with a wide audience.
Hacking, manipulation, or simple error : several scenarios on the table
For now, no clarification message has been published by OpenAI or by the ChatGPT teams. No official removal of the story has been mentioned by CoinMarketCap. The lack of communication fuels speculation, in a context where precedents abound.
In several similar cases, high-authority accounts have been hijacked to promote scams or worthless tokens. However, nothing currently confirms that a hack did take place. Hypotheses range from security failure to an unintentional post via a third-party tool.
If it is not hacking, then the question of editorial control arises. Is it possible that a third-party team had access to the account? Or that internal tests were poorly supervised? This uncertainty fuels distrust. Especially since the Pump.fun crypto platform is, itself, controversial. An instant memecoin creation tool, it is often criticized for its lack of transparency and its potential for rapid market manipulation.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
