Ethereum Holds Crown While Solana’s Developer Surge Shakes Up the Blockchain Pecking Order

The blockchain wars heat up as Ethereum maintains dominance—but Solana's dev army won't back down.

The Incumbent vs. The Upstart

Ethereum's first-mover advantage keeps it atop the food chain, while Solana's blistering developer growth signals a potential power shift. High-speed, low-cost transactions lure builders away from Ethereum's gas fee nightmare—though let's be real, both still crash more often than a DeFi degenerate's portfolio.

Network Effects Collide

Ethereum's established ecosystem acts as moat, but Solana's scaling promise chips away at its defenses. Validators report record activity on both chains, proving there's enough hype to go around—for now.

The Bottom Line

While VC-backed chains battle for developer mindshare, remember: most of these projects will vanish faster than a crypto bro's Twitter verification. But the infrastructure battle? That's where the real money gets made—just ask the ETH maximalists quietly stacking SOL on the side.

In brief

• Ethereum tops all blockchains with 31,869 active developers, maintaining dominance despite slower growth.
• Solana attracts over 17,000 developers, showing rapid expansion and challenging Ethereum’s long-held lead.
• Bitcoin ranks third with 11,036 developers, reflecting steady but slower ecosystem engagement.
• Debate rises over developer counts as experts question data accuracy and inclusion of automated projects.

Ethereum Retains Largest Developer Base, Followed by Solana and Bitcoin

Between January and September, more than 16,000 new developers began contributing to the Ethereum ecosystem, according to data from the Ethereum Foundation. Solana followed with over 11,500 new developers, though a representative from the Solana Foundation suggested the data may be outdated. Bitcoin ranked third, attracting nearly 7,500 new developers in the same period.

A closer look at the data shows that:

• Ethereum leads with 31,869 active developers, making it the largest developer base across all blockchain ecosystems.
• Solana ranks second with 17,708 developers, showing continued strong developer interest.
• Bitcoin holds third place with 11,036 active developers contributing to its ecosystem.
• The Ethereum figure includes contributors to both layer-1 and layer-2 networks, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Unichain, without double-counting developers active across multiple projects. 

It is worth noting that developers active across multiple Ethereum-based projects were not double-counted.

Ethereum Growth Slows as Solana Gains Momentum

Although Ethereum leads in total developer numbers, its growth has been modest—rising 5.8% over the past year and 6.3% over the past two years. By contrast, solana has shown stronger momentum. Electric Capital’s tracker reports a 29.1% increase in full-time developers over the past year and a 61.7% rise over the past two years.

Despite these figures, Jacob Creech, Solana Foundation’s head of developer relations, claims that the data undercounts Solana developers by around 7,800. He urged developers to register their GitHub repositories to help improve Solana’s internal tracking.

Several community members have questioned how Electric Capital grouped developer data. Some chains operating on the Ethereum VIRTUAL Machine (EVM) were merged, while others were excluded.

Tomasz K. Stańczak, founder of Nethermind, argued that EVM-based networks such as Polygon and BNB Chain should be considered together since they share compatible tooling and developer skill sets.

Skepticism Grows Over Reported Developer Numbers

Some industry observers remain skeptical of the reported developer numbers. Jarrod Watts, head of Australia for the layer-2 project Abstract, said the figures may be inflated by repositories generated by automated coding tools and temporary hackathon projects.

Watts suggested that short-term or low-quality code—such as hackathon projects and inactive repositories—may inflate the developer figures. He added that genuine new developer participation appears limited this year.

A social media user known as memevsculture noted a gap between the reported number of developers and the visible number of active decentralized applications, suggesting that developer counts may not fully reflect meaningful activity.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.