Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Bid to Oust Fed Chair Powell—Central Bank Independence Wins

In a landmark ruling that reinforces the firewall between politics and monetary policy, the Supreme Court just clipped presidential authority over the Federal Reserve.

No more ’you’re fired’ for Powell—Trump’s attempt to axe the Fed chair hit a constitutional brick wall. The decision sends a clear signal: central bank independence isn’t negotiable, even for presidents who treat economic institutions like reality TV show contestants.

Funny how politicians love ’autonomous’ agencies... until they actually act autonomously.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell got a breather from the Supreme Court after rumors of TRUMP planning to fire him made the rounds on social media. Shutting down such claims, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that the Federal Reserve is not subject to presidential firing power, even as it allowed Donald Trump to remove leaders of certain independent federal agencies. The decision offers a layer of protection to Powell, who has faced public criticism from Trump in the past. 

Not All Agencies Are Equal

The ruling, which Bloomberg reports came down on May 23, clarifies that while Trump may remove officials from agencies like the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), this does not extend to the Fed. The court described the central bank as a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity,” essentially putting it in its category, and out of Trump’s reach.

The Supreme Court just said in dicta that the members of the “quasi-private” entity known as the Federal Reserve are protected against removal pic.twitter.com/DGnvOvdiVZ

Relief for Powell, Leverage for Trump

This legal clarity likely calms concerns around Powell’s job security. Trump, known for bashing the Fed over interest rates, had previously suggested Powell’s firing was imminent, though he later backed off. Meanwhile, the ruling boosts Trump’s ability to overhaul other federal agencies if re-elected, reshaping how executive power could play out in a second term.

Not everyone on the bench agreed. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the dissenting liberal justices, criticized the ruling as a political loophole and accused the court of creating a “special rule” just to spare the Fed. She argued it weakens existing protections meant to insulate federal agencies from political swings.

• Also Read :
•   U.S. SEC Delays Decision-Making on More Crypto ETFs Led by XRP and Litecoin
•   ,

Even crypto community reacted strongly on this judgement, Mr. VIX noted that the Court may have unintentionally confirmed that the U.S. government handed control of money printing to an entity beyond public accountability. He questions whether SCOTUS understands the implications of what it just acknowledged.

While the Fed escapes political pressure for now, this ruling reopens debates over agency independence and presidential authority. It also comes at a critical time when global markets are watching how U.S. institutions balance power, law, and economic stability.

For now, Powell remains safe, but the tug-of-war between the WHITE House and Washington’s independent agencies is far from over.

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

FAQs

Trump frequently criticized Powell for not lowering interest rates quickly enough, believing higher rates could harm the economy and impede growth

No, the Supreme Court ruled the Federal Reserve is a “uniquely structured” entity not subject to presidential firing power, protecting Powell.