Bitcoin Jesus Rises Again? $8.6B Whale Move Sparks Market Frenzy!

Rumors swirl as a mysterious $8.6 billion Bitcoin transfer shakes the crypto world—just another day in the Wild West of digital assets.

Whale Watching Gone Wild

A single transaction worth more than most hedge funds’ AUM has traders asking: Is this the return of Bitcoin Jesus, or just another whale playing puppetmaster with the market?

Theories—and leverage—are flying as analysts scramble to decode the move. Meanwhile, retail investors FOMO in like it’s 2021 all over again.

Finance’s dirty little secret? The ‘decentralized’ market still dances when big money snaps its fingers.

Bitcoin whale movement sparks debate

The massive movement, first spotted by blockchain analysts Arkham, involved multiple batches of 10,000 BTC each and concluded within hours, raising questions and curiosity across the market. However, at the time of writing, there seemed to be no signs that the whale intended to sell his stash.

In fact, on-chain data suggested the activity may have been part of an address upgrade, transitioning from legacy “1-” bitcoin addresses to newer “bc1q-” formats.

Interestingly, these coins were originally mined in 2011 and obtained through Coinbase transactions, the reward mechanism granted to miners for validating new blocks.

While the sheer size of the transfer sparked speculation, the methodical nature of the MOVE pointedto a more technical, rather than market-driven motive.

How did Bitcoin’s price react to this?

A day prior to the massive whale transfer, Bitcoin was comfortably trading in bullish territory. However, the unexpected movement of 80,000 BTC appeared to shake investor confidence a little, nudging the crypto into a bearish zone around the $107,000-mark.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was continuing to hover within this range. 

Despite this temporary pullback, however, technical indicators like the RSI and MACD remained above neutral – A sign that bullish momentum still outweighed bearish pressure on the charts. 

Source: Trading View

Additionally, on-chain data from the Bitcoin Spent Output Age Bands chart revealed a remarkable shift in activity from long-term holders.

Particularly those who have held their BTC for over a year, and who may be finally taking profits after Bitcoin crossed $100k in 2025.

Source: Glassnode

This has led to one of the largest wealth redistributions in Bitcoin’s history. Especially as early adopters cashed out while new institutional players absorbed the supply.

Despite the hike in selling pressure, Bitcoin’s resilience above $100k is a sign of growing institutional demand, alluding to a healthy market phase. 

Who could be behind this?

While the motives behind the recent $8.6 billion Bitcoin transfer remain uncertain, speculation continues to swirl around the identity of the whale.

Blockchain research firm 10x Research suggested that although there is no direct evidence that the funds were being moved for sale, early BTC holders may be strategically distributing their holdings to meet growing demand from ETFs and corporate treasuries.

The trail of clues has led many to speculate that the wallet might belong to Roger Ver, famously dubbed “Bitcoin Jesus.” He became one of Bitcoin’s earliest evangelists after entering the space in early 2011.

Notably, the coins in question had remained untouched since May 2011, just months after Ver’s reported involvement in the crypto space.

Here, it’s worth noting that Ver was recently released on bail from a Spanish prison in early June, shortly before the massive wallet activity was detected.

Another possible answer

Another theory seemed to point to the elusive early miner ArtForz, who once commanded up to 25% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate in 2010 and reportedly mined over 400,000 BTC using GPU technology.

The fact that these 80,000 coins originated from GPU mining rewards lends weight to this alternate theory.

Whether tied to Ver, ArtForz, or another early adopter, the move marks a rare and fascinating glimpse into the digital vaults of Bitcoin’s earliest participants.