Cook Exposes Trump’s Hidden Motives in Harvard Funding Clash

Political tensions flare as Trump's Harvard funding maneuver reveals deeper agenda—power plays masquerading as policy.

Behind the Ivy Curtain

What starts as another funding skirmish quickly unravels into a strategic power grab. Cook's allegations cut through the political noise, pointing to motives far removed from educational reform.

Dollars Over Diplomas

Follow the money—always. Trump's move bypasses traditional funding channels, raising eyebrows from Wall Street to Cambridge. Another day, another financial chess move disguised as public interest.

Legacy on the Line

Harvard's endowment becomes collateral in a high-stakes game where prestige and power collide. The real lesson? Even elite institutions aren't immune to political theatrics—especially when someone's settling scores.

Because nothing says 'educational reform' like using Ivy League endowments as political bargaining chips. Just ask the hedge fund managers already repositioning their portfolios.

‘Transparent Two-Step’

In her filing, Cook argues the Harvard ruling exposes the “transparent two-step” used by the Trump administration, where the president makes ideologically driven statements before taking an illegal action and then claims later in court that he had a legitimate motive.

Trump’s public statements demanding that the Fed lower interest rates, urging Chairman Jerome Powell to resign, and “touting the fact that he will soon have a majority on the Board” are “flatly” inconsistent with the government’s position that Trump’s basis for ousting Cook was alleged mortgage fraud.

“This court can adopt precisely the same approach as the Harvard court took,” Lowell said in the filing.

Earlier Thursday, the Justice Department made fresh arguments about why Trump should be allowed to oust Cook while she challenges her removal, saying her claim that her termination is a pretext to get her out of the way and lower interest rates is “baseless.”

“Dr. Cook’s policy disagreements with the President cannot be used to immunize her from the consequences of her misconduct or removal for such a cause-based rationale,” the US said in the filing, which followed reports that the Justice Department had opened a criminal investigation into Cook.

Earlier in the week, Cook told the judge that Trump was making “cut and paste” allegations against her, alluding to similar mortgage fraud claims Trump has made against high-profile Democratic critics.

(Updates with detail from Cook’s court filing.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

• Why Iowa Chooses Not to Clean Up Its Polluted Water

• Novo Has High Hopes That Ozempic Pill Can Also Fight Dementia

• What If We’re Doing AI All Wrong?

• Is Elon Musk Planning to Break Up With Tesla?

• Trump’s Housing Chief Wants to Build, But With What?

©2025 Bloomberg L.P.