Trump’s Second Year: What It Means for Stocks in 2026

Markets brace for turbulence as Trump enters year two.

The Policy Whiplash Effect

Regulatory rollbacks hit warp speed—energy, finance, and tech sectors first in line. Tariff threats resurface, sending supply chain analysts scrambling for antacids. Corporate tax cuts get another look, fueling boardroom fantasies of buyback bonanzas.

Sector Winners and Losers

Defense contractors lock in gains while green energy plays face headwinds. Traditional banking cheers deregulation, but fintech disruptors barely blink. The volatility index becomes your new best friend—or your portfolio's worst enemy.

The Fed's Impossible Position

Inflation fighters clash with growth promoters at every FOMC meeting. Rate cut hopes dance with deficit fears in a macroeconomic tango. Bond traders develop nervous twitches watching presidential tweetstorms.

Global Ripple Effects

Allies recalibrate trade strategies as America-first policies intensify. Emerging markets hedge dollar exposure while crypto markets price in political uncertainty. Gold bugs emerge from their bunkers with knowing smirks.

Bottom line: Buckle up for policy-driven swings that make technical analysis look like astrology. Smart money's already positioning for 2028—because on Wall Street, the next election cycle starts before the inauguration confetti's swept away.

Key Takeaways

• The second year of a president’s term can mean comparatively bad news for stocks, according to the “Presidential Election Cycle Theory” coined by Stock Trader’s Almanac founder Yale Hirsch.
• Bank of America analysts warned clients this week that historical returns would suggest some pressure this year before a stronger 2027.   

Could the second year of President Donald Trump's second term buck theories suggesting headwinds for stocks? The data points to the likelihood of tough times ahead—but history doesn't tell the whole story.

The second year of a presidential term tends to be the weakest of the four-year cycle, if the “Presidential Election Cycle Theory” is to be believed. The theory, coined by Stock Trader’s Almanac founder Yale Hirsch, holds that U.S. stocks tend to perform relatively poorly in the first year following a presidential election, with an even weaker second year, before a stronger second half of the term. 

Early reactions to new policies aimed at fulfilling campaign promises, along with political uncertainty heading into midterm elections, have been posited as explanations for trends pointing to weaker performance in the first half of a term. Efforts to shore up the economy and gain influence ahead of the next election are typically seen as helping returns in the second half.

Why This Matters to Investors

Seasonality in America's election cycle hasn’t historically favored the second year of a president’s term. That history might worry some investors, though markets could defy the trend—as they did in the first year of President Trump's second term.

Bank of America analysts warned clients last week that historical returns supporting the theory WOULD suggest market underperformance this year, before likely giving way to a stronger 2027.  

Since 1940, the S&P 500 has risen an average of 4.2% in the second years of presidential terms, compared to an average annual gain of about 9% over the full period, the analysts observed. Most of that relative pressure could come heading into midterms, the analysts said, even with the possibility that the fourth quarter of 2026 could bring a Santa Claus rally, lifting markets to close out the year.

The bank's current target of 7100 for the S&P 500 at the end of 2026 would suggest a roughly 4% return for the year, well below the benchmark index's long-term average.

Related Education

Then again, the end of 2025 failed to deliver a Santa Claus rally for investors—and the first year of President Trump's second term proved to be a relatively strong one for U.S. markets, with the S&P 500 logging a 16% gain.

Both outcomes defied broad market theories, reinforcing the importance of another well-known market adage that past performance does not guarantee future results.