Ex-SEC Official Confirms: Judge Isn’t Delaying Ripple vs SEC Case – Here’s Why It Matters

The Ripple vs SEC saga takes another twist—but don’t blame the judge for the delays. A former SEC insider just dropped a truth bomb that’s shaking crypto circles.

No More Finger-Pointing

Contrary to popular speculation, the presiding judge isn’t the bottleneck in this high-stakes legal showdown. The ex-official’s revelation cuts through the noise, putting the focus back where it belongs: on the SEC’s relentless pursuit and Ripple’s fight for clarity.

Why This Changes Everything

With institutional investors eyeing XRP’s next move, every legal update sends ripples (pun intended) through the market. Yet somehow, Wall Street’s old guard still thinks crypto’s the unstable one.

One thing’s clear—this case won’t fade quietly. And when it finally wraps? Expect fireworks.

TLDR

• The Ripple vs SEC case is progressing without any delays or obstructions from either party.
• Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel stated that Judge Torres has no further role in the ongoing legal process.
• The case is now in the dismissal phase which follows standard procedural steps typically lasting one to two months.
• Neither Ripple nor the SEC has officially filed to dismiss their appeals at this stage.
• Marc Fagel confirmed that the court is not responsible for the timeline as the matter is now handled administratively.

The Ripple vs SEC case continues its expected course, with no party causing undue delays in the legal process. Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel clarified that the current stage involves procedural formalities, not judicial interventions. The case is advancing according to standard legal timelines, with both parties following established procedures.

No Court Delays in Ripple Lawsuit

The Ripple vs SEC case has reached a phase where no decisions remain pending before Judge Analisa Torres. According to Marc Fagel, Judge Torres has already fulfilled her role, and there is no active issue before the court. This clarification addresses community concerns about the judge allegedly delaying the joint motion approval.

Nobody is holding up the case. Not the judge (there is nothing for her to decide), not the SEC (which has a standard procedure to follow, and will dismiss the appeal once the vote is taken, a process that typically takes 1-2 months).

— Marc Fagel (@Marc_Fagel) July 13, 2025

The case now centers on formal dismissal processes, and the court is not responsible for any timing issues at this stage. Fagel emphasized that standard dismissal procedures are taking place, which typically span one to two months post-vote. Therefore, the judge has no further duties unless either party makes new filings.

Recent speculation claimed that Judge Torres was stalling the Ripple vs SEC case, causing community frustration. However, Fagel reaffirmed that such claims are unfounded, as there is nothing left for the judge to determine. The case’s current state is administrative, focusing only on procedural completion by both sides.

SEC and Ripple Follow Routine Dismissal Steps

The Ripple vs. SEC case now depends on Ripple and the SEC finalizing their mutual appeal dismissals. Fagel noted that both parties are expected to file official documents soon to complete the final procedural requirements. So far, no official filings of appeal dismissals have occurred, but the process remains on track.

Fagel confirmed that the SEC is not delaying the case intentionally and is instead adhering to internal procedural timelines. The agency requires a formal vote before moving forward with the dismissal, which typically takes a few weeks. This vote is part of the SEC’s normal operations and does not reflect reluctance or obstruction.

Additionally, Ripple has not made any official filing to drop its appeal either, though it is expected to do so. Both sides have reached a stage where legal disputes are resolved, and only paperwork remains. These steps align with standard legal processes that require completion before the case can be formally closed.

Ripple vs SEC Case Nears Conclusion

The Ripple vs. SEC case shows signs of nearing its legal conclusion without interference from any involved party. Current developments suggest that only final dismissals remain, with all substantive litigation issues already addressed. Fagel’s comments clarify misunderstandings and reinforce confidence in the timeline.

So far, neither Ripple nor the SEC has introduced new motions or appeals in court, supporting the case’s steady progression. This confirms that the Ripple vs. SEC case follows a regular post-settlement timeline and does not face any procedural disruptions. The next public update is likely when dismissal filings are officially entered.