Judge Torres Shuts Down Ripple-SEC Settlement: XRP Lawsuit Takes Dramatic Turn

In a stunning twist, Judge Analisa Torres just torpedoed the proposed Ripple-SEC settlement—throwing the XRP legal battle back into chaos.

The ruling comes after months of closed-door negotiations between the crypto giant and regulators. Torres didn’t mince words, rejecting the joint motion without even entertaining revisions. Legal experts call it a 'hard reset' for the case.

For Ripple, it’s back to square one. The SEC’s crusade against crypto just got fresh ammunition—and XRP holders are left holding the bag (as usual). Meanwhile, Wall Street lawyers rack up billable hours.

One thing’s clear: this fight isn’t ending quietly. Buckle up for more courtroom fireworks—and another excuse for XRP’s price to swing wildly on zero actual progress.

TLDR

• Judge Analisa Torres has denied the joint motion filed by Ripple and the SEC in the XRP lawsuit.
• Both parties had requested to modify a prior judgment but failed to show exceptional circumstances.
• The court refused to dissolve the permanent injunction against Ripple or reduce the financial penalty.
• The ruling emphasized the importance of maintaining the finality of court judgments.
• Ripple now remains bound by the original penalty and restrictions imposed by the court.

A major ruling has shifted the landscape of the XRP lawsuit as Judge Analisa Torres denied Ripple and the SEC’s joint motion. Both parties sought to modify a prior judgment, but the court firmly rejected their request. This decision halts their effort to reduce penalties and dissolve the permanent injunction against Ripple.

The judgment marks a significant turn in the XRP lawsuit, which has lasted multiple years. Ripple and the SEC reached a partial settlement earlier, hoping for a favorable court endorsement. However, the court emphasized that procedural integrity must prevail over negotiated agreements.

Though both parties submitted a revised joint motion after the initial denial, the court stood firm in its interpretation. Judge Torres ruled that neither party demonstrated exceptional circumstances to warrant an indicative ruling. Therefore, the court retained its original decision without modification.

Ripple’s Position Undermined in the XRP Lawsuit

Ripple aimed to secure relief from penalties imposed in the previous judgment by pushing for court approval of its settlement. However, the court noted that the justice system should not revise final judgments without a substantial public interest. The ruling implies Ripple must comply with the initial penalty and injunction terms.

Ripple’s legal team sought a procedural path that WOULD ease regulatory constraints and resolve the XRP lawsuit efficiently. Yet the court did not find adequate justification to reverse or reduce its earlier stance. This outcome leaves Ripple with limited options to challenge the judgment further.

#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP BREAKING: Judge Torres has denied the parties’ Motion for an Indicative Ruling. pic.twitter.com/9AMhGcQUsU

— James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) June 26, 2025

Following this judicial setback, Ripple’s position in the XRP lawsuit faces renewed scrutiny. While the company may continue its operations, the permanent injunction remains intact. The denial prevents any immediate regulatory relief for Ripple at this stage.

SEC Faces Its Own Legal Setback

The SEC also received a blow as the court denied its attempt to finalize its agreement with Ripple. Despite its role in the settlement, the commission could not sway the court’s interpretation of extraordinary circumstances. The ruling reinforces the independence of judicial outcomes from agency settlements.

Judge Torres cited previous Supreme Court rulings that stressed the permanence of final judgments in the absence of public interest concerns. This legal benchmark challenged the SEC’s argument, leading to a firm denial from the court. The case thus continues without modification to the earlier judgment.

The XRP lawsuit remains a central case in crypto regulation, and this ruling adds complexity for the SEC’s enforcement strategies. With this decision, the court reaffirmed its position from earlier stages of the XRP lawsuit. Both Ripple and the SEC must now reconsider their legal strategies going forward.