BTCC / BTCC Square / coincentral /
JNJ Stock: Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $1.5 Billion in Landmark Talc Cancer Lawsuit

JNJ Stock: Jury Orders Johnson & Johnson to Pay $1.5 Billion in Landmark Talc Cancer Lawsuit

Published:
2025-12-23 10:49:11
16
3

Another day, another multi-billion dollar verdict against a corporate giant—just your average Tuesday in the American legal system.

The Verdict Hits the Books

A jury delivered a staggering financial blow, ordering the healthcare behemoth to pay a sum of $1.5 billion. The ruling stems from long-running litigation over allegations linking one of its iconic consumer products to serious health risks.

Market Mechanics in Motion

While traditional equities grapple with legacy liabilities and courtroom drama, the decentralized finance sector operates on a different set of rules—code is law, and smart contracts don't get emotional. This case underscores the perennial risks embedded in 'safe' blue-chip stocks, where a single lawsuit can erase billions in shareholder value overnight. It's a stark reminder that in TradFi, your investment can be cut by a jury's decision as easily as by a bad earnings report.

One can't help but muse that for the cost of this verdict, you could have built several robust, immutable DeFi protocols from the ground up—protocols that don't have a 'talc' problem. The old world continues to price its past, while the new one builds its future.

TLDR

  • A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder
  • The verdict includes $59.84 million in compensatory damages and $1.5 billion in punitive damages split between J&J and its subsidiary
  • Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the decision, calling it “egregious” and “unconstitutional”
  • The company faces over 67,000 lawsuits related to talc products and cancer claims
  • J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. in 2020 and globally in 2023

A Baltimore jury delivered a massive blow to Johnson & Johnson on Monday, ordering the healthcare giant and its subsidiaries to pay more than $1.5 billion to a single plaintiff in a talc cancer case. The verdict represents the largest-ever sum awarded against J&J for an individual plaintiff in these ongoing legal battles.

A jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay about $1.56 billion to a Maryland woman who blamed the company’s talc-based baby powder for causing her asbestos-linked cancer https://t.co/UV5V04LyS3

— Bloomberg (@business) December 23, 2025

The Circuit Court for Baltimore City found J&J, two of its subsidiaries, and spinoff Kenvue liable for failing to warn Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos. Craft was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in January 2024.


JNJ Stock Card
Johnson & Johnson, JNJ

The award breaks down to $59.84 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages totaling $1.5 billion. J&J received a $1 billion punitive damage assessment, while its subsidiary Pecos River Talc was hit with $500 million.

Craft’s legal team painted a picture of preventable tragedy. “Cherie Craft runs a non-profit where she pours her life into helping others. Her cancer was preventable,” said Jessica Dean, a partner at Dean Omar Branham Shirley. “She used Johnson’s Baby Powder every day of her life until she was diagnosed with cancer.”

Company Maintains Products Are Safe

J&J wasted no time announcing its intention to appeal. Erik Haas, the company’s worldwide vice president of litigation, called the ruling “egregious” and “patently unconstitutional.” He argued the decision resulted from “gross errors” by the trial court.

The company maintains its talc products are SAFE and asbestos-free. “These lawsuits are predicated on junk science,” Haas said, citing decades of studies supporting their position.

This isn’t J&J’s first rodeo with large talc verdicts. Earlier in December, a California jury awarded $40 million to two women who blamed the company’s baby powder for their ovarian cancer.

Mountain of Legal Claims

The company faces a staggering backlog of over 67,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs claiming cancer diagnoses after using its baby powder and other talc products. J&J has consistently denied these allegations.

The company has tried to resolve the litigation through bankruptcy settlements worth billions. Courts have rejected those attempts.

J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020. The company ended global sales in 2023, switching to cornstarch-based alternatives instead.

Many previous large awards against J&J in talc cases have been reduced or overturned on appeal. The company has set aside billions of dollars for litigation costs and settlements.

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare cancer affecting the lining of the abdomen and abdominal organs. It’s most commonly linked to asbestos exposure. While no cure exists, treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, and palliative care can help manage symptoms.

The Maryland jury found J&J and Kenvue liable for failing to provide adequate warnings about potential asbestos content in their talc products.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.