Charles Hoskinson Fires Back at Cointelegraph Over Defamation Claims - Demands Accountability
Cardano founder takes legal stand against media giant in crypto's latest credibility clash
The Accusation That Shook Crypto Media
Charles Hoskinson launches scathing attack against Cointelegraph, alleging defamatory reporting practices that threaten industry integrity. The Cardano creator demands immediate corrective action, signaling growing tension between blockchain innovators and mainstream crypto coverage.
Truth vs. Sensationalism in Digital Asset Reporting
Hoskinson's public callout exposes the delicate balance between breaking news and responsible journalism in the fast-moving crypto space. Industry leaders rally behind the demand for higher reporting standards as misinformation continues to plague digital asset markets.
The Ripple Effect on Crypto Credibility
This confrontation highlights the ongoing struggle for legitimacy in an industry where one misleading headline can wipe billions from market caps overnight. Veteran investors nod knowingly—another day, another media-fueled crypto drama that makes traditional finance scandals look almost quaint by comparison.
The crypto community watches closely as this battle between builder and broadcaster could set new precedents for media accountability in the decentralized age.
TLDR
- Charles Hoskinson has accused Cointelegraph of defamation over its coverage of the $600 million ADA voucher controversy.
- The Cardano founder demands a retraction from Cointelegraph, stating that requiring journalistic integrity is not pressure.
- An independent forensic audit cleared Hoskinson of any wrongdoing, finding that 99.7% of ADA vouchers were redeemed correctly.
- Hoskinson urges other cryptocurrency projects to pull ads from Cointelegraph and avoid attending its events.
- Cointelegraph’s editor-in-chief Jon Rice has refused to retract the story despite the audit’s findings and Hoskinson’s demands.
Charles Hoskinson, CEO of Input Output Global (IOG), has strongly criticized Cointelegraph for spreading false information. He accused the crypto news outlet of defamation over a report concerning $600 million worth of ADA vouchers. Hoskinson has demanded an apology and warned other crypto projects to distance themselves from Cointelegraph.
ADA Voucher Controversy Explained
The controversy began in May when NFT artist Masato Alexander claimed that Hoskinson misused his genesis key to steal ADA tokens. Alexander alleged that the Cardano ledger was manipulated, leading to the loss of $600 million in ADA vouchers. Hoskinson denied the accusations and stated that most of the vouchers were redeemed by ICO participants.
It's come to my attention that apparently @Cointelegraph's editor in chief refuses to publish a retraction about the story they ran on the alleged ADA voucher theft.
Apparently, they will run a story that we are "pressuring them". Telling people to tell the truth about what…
— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) September 28, 2025
Despite the claims, an independent forensic audit conducted by McDermott Will & Emery and BDO found that 99.7% of the ADA vouchers were correctly redeemed. The remaining unclaimed tokens were allocated to fund ecosystem grants through Interspect, a cardano governance body. The audit’s exoneration of Hoskinson undermined the allegations and called for accountability from the news outlet.
Charles Hoskinson Calls for Action Against Cointelegraph
Hoskinson criticized Cointelegraph for its refusal to retract the story despite the audit’s findings. He accused Jon Rice, Cointelegraph’s editor-in-chief, of refusing to correct the misinformation.
“Requiring basic journalistic integrity does not constitute pressure,” Hoskinson remarked, addressing the publication’s refusal to issue a retraction.
The Cardano founder further advised other cryptocurrency projects to remove their ads from Cointelegraph and not attend Cointelegraph events, urging them to avoid legitimizing the outlet. According to Hoskinson, the continued spread of false information harms the crypto community and undermines trust in journalism.