Emmer’s Blockchain Shield: New Bill Aims to Safeguard Crypto Devs from Regulatory Overreach

Washington just threw crypto developers a lifeline—or at least a legal loophole. Minnesota Rep. Tom Emmer’s newly introduced blockchain bill promises to protect coders from bearing liability for decentralized networks they didn’t intend to control. Because nothing says ’innovation-friendly’ like needing congressional intervention to keep the SEC off your back.

The proposed legislation draws a clear line between active participants and passive infrastructure creators—finally acknowledging that not every GitHub contributor should be treated like a Fortune 500 CEO. Of course, Wall Street banks will still get their taxpayer-funded safety nets while builders risk prison for open-source contributions. Some ’decentralized’ future.

• Bill clarifies that developers who don’t custody funds aren’t transmitters.
• Industry groups back BRCA to ensure U.S. leads in blockchain innovation.
• The bill faces challenges amid political divisions and crypto concerns.

The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) has been reintroduced in Congress to protect digital asset developers. The bipartisan effort is led by Representatives Tom Emmer and Ritchie Torres, who are both part of the Congressional crypto Caucus. The bill clarifies that developers who do not manage customer funds are not considered money transmitters.

The BRCA intends to provide clear regulations for blockchain developers. It tries to separate developers who facilitate transactions from those who do not. As a result, the bill WOULD make it easier for developers to focus on new ideas and technology.

BRCA Protects Blockchain Developers

To avoid extra regulations, the bill distinguishes developers from money transmitters. Those developing for Blockchain developers will not have to meet the same strict guidelines as those who handle finance transactions. This clarification is important because it promotes innovation in the U.S digital asset market.

Emmer pointed out that there is a risk of pushing developers abroad could happen if the U.S. does not take action. 

“The longer we delay this commonsense clarification, the greater the risk that this transformative technology is pushed overseas,” he stated. 

Advocates believe that this action will protect U.S innovators and maintain the U.S.’s leadership in blockchain.

Bill Garners Industry and Bipartisan Support

Industry groups such as the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation have backed the bill. They believe that the law is important  to ensure a stable environment for digital asset growth. However, its future is unclear because of the current political divisions. 

Under the BRCA, a developer who does not keep consumer funds is not considered a money transmitter. This means, open-source developers will face fewer regulatory obstacles. 

The bill continues to encounter problems in Washington. A number of Democratic lawmakers have raised questions about other bills related to cryptocurrency. Trump’s ties to the crypto industry and the TRUMP memecoin has raised concerns from lawmakers.

Crypto Regulation; A Hot Topic in the U.S

Meanwhile, other bills that address different parts of crypto regulation are under discussion. The stablecoin regulation bill, GENIUS Act, has passed an initial Cloture vote. The STABLE Act which addresses stablecoin usage, continues to advance through Congress.

Even though Washington is divided, several states have taken action to regulate crypto. In Texas, the state Senate approved a bill to create a Bitcoin reserve. 

The BRCA is part of wider efforts to establish clearer rules in the cryptocurrency world. With the support from both sides of the political divide and major industry groups, the bill could guide future blockchain regulations in the United States.

Related Reading | solana Explodes Past $177: Will New Consensus Protocol Drive It to $389?