BTCC / BTCC Square / Tronweekly /
Dubai Court Freezes $456M in Justin Sun’s Techteryx Bailout Funds—Here’s What Went Down

Dubai Court Freezes $456M in Justin Sun’s Techteryx Bailout Funds—Here’s What Went Down

Author:
Tronweekly
Published:
2025-11-13 18:00:00
8
1

Dubai authorities just dropped the hammer on $456 million tied to Justin Sun’s controversial Techteryx bailout. The freeze raises fresh questions about the opaque world of crypto rescues—and who’s really holding the bag.

The backstory: When Techteryx wobbled, Sun swooped in with a lifeline. Now courts are probing whether that cash played by the rules. Classic crypto: solve one crisis, start another.

Why it matters: This isn’t pocket change—it’s half a billion dollars frozen mid-transit. The move signals regulators are done rubber-stamping big-money crypto maneuvers.

The kicker: Another day, another nine-figure crypto drama. At least Dubai’s courts didn’t bill their investigation time in $ETH.

Techteryx

  • Dubai’s Digital Economy Court froze $456 million due to ongoing allegations that Techteryx’s reserve funds were fraudulently redirected and misused.
  • The freeze order will remain in effect until Hong Kong courts determine who truly owns the assets.

Dubai’s Digital Economy Court has frozen over $456 million connected to Justin Sun’s bailout of Techteryx, the company that supports the TrueUSD (TUSD) stablecoin. Based on the reports, Michael Black, the justice who issued the ruling, stated that there was strong evidence that the money violated the breach of trust, and it’s because of that the funds were immediately frozen.

Basically, they froze this money in order to stop the money from being transferred, hidden, or used in any way until the courts in Hong Kong determine the rightful ownership of the assets. The justice also emphasized that the freeze order WOULD remain active until the Hong Kong court proceedings come to an end.

Techteryx Legal Battle in Hong Kong

The Hong Kong case first started on the 19th of December 2023, and it was filed by Techteryx Limited against several parties, including the First Digital Trust Limited (FDT), Finaport Pte Ltd, Aria Fund, and Aria DMCC. In the lawsuit Techteryx served, it accused these four organizations of fraudulently making use of investment reserves worth hundreds and even running to millions of dollars.

The alleged $456 million in question was transferred through six separate remittances made by FDT and Legacy Trust, both of which were reportedly under the management of Mr. Vincent Chok. So, to explain better, these funds were meant to be handled responsibly, but instead, there are claims that they were redirected and used for purposes that are unclear.

Techteryx has built its case around the alleged connections between Finaport, FDT, Crossbridge, and Legacy Trust, which together, according to the lawsuit, formed the basis of the fraudulent conspiracy. One of the major concerns raised by the investigators is why such a large amount of money was paid to Aria DMCC instead of Aria Fund, as it was originally intended.

So in essence, the redirection of these funds even raises more suspicion and has caused the courts to investigate the true nature of the transactions as well as the parties involved.

This decision marks another major chapter in the ongoing investigation into how Techteryx’s reserve funds were handled and whether the parties involved acted in bad faith. For now, all the frozen funds will remain locked under the authority of Dubai’s Digital Economy Court, and they will make sure nothing can be moved or tampered with until the truth behind the controversial funds come to light.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.