BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptoslate /
A new loophole just proved you don’t actually own your shares – but the fix is already live on Solana

A new loophole just proved you don’t actually own your shares – but the fix is already live on Solana

Published:
2025-12-10 23:30:06
13
1

A new loophole just proved you don’t actually own your shares – but the fix is already live on Solana

Think you own your stocks? Think again. A newly exposed flaw in traditional finance reveals a chilling truth—your shares might not be yours at all. While legacy systems scramble, a solution is already operational on a major blockchain.

The Paper Trail Problem

The loophole isn't a bug—it's a feature of an outdated system. Ownership often exists as an entry in a centralized ledger, not as a direct, immutable claim. This creates a single point of failure and control, a vulnerability that has been exploited for decades. It’s the financial equivalent of renting an apartment but being told you own the building.

Blockchain's Immutable Answer

Enter the fix. By leveraging a public, distributed ledger, true digital ownership becomes possible. Every transaction is recorded, time-stamped, and cryptographically secured. It cuts out the middleman, bypasses the need for trust in a central authority, and places the asset directly in the holder's wallet. The technology transforms ownership from a promise in a database to a verifiable fact on-chain.

Why Solana Got There First

Speed and scale made it the testing ground. The network's high throughput and low transaction costs allow for the complex settlement logic of securities to be executed near-instantly and transparently. It demonstrates that the infrastructure for a more resilient system isn't a distant dream—it's live and processing. Traditional exchanges, meanwhile, are still debating the color of the committee meeting room's walls.

The Ownership Revolution Has a Deadline

The existence of this fix on a live network changes the conversation. It moves the debate from theoretical 'what ifs' to practical 'why nots.' It pressures legacy institutions to innovate or be left with an increasingly questionable value proposition. The cynical finance jab? Wall Street finally has something to fear besides its own quarterly reports. The race isn't just about technology anymore—it's about who actually controls your assets.

Distribution is preparing to follow issuance

Backpack exchange has said it will list SEC-registered, natively tokenized U.S. equities via an integration with Superstate, starting with non-U.S. access while pursuing U.S. broker-dealer and ATS paths.

The venue model positions wallets, KYC rails, and whitelisted order FLOW as the front door for investors without synthetic wrappers or SPV structures. That distinction is a key clarification for 2025, following episodes where tokenized stock marketing created confusion between on-chain exposures and actual registered equity, as reported by Business Insider in the context of synthetic offerings.

The near-term contest is about who controls the cap table and the order books. If the transfer agent and the chain FORM the golden source of ownership for KYC’d wallets, then distribution and secondary trading can route through a mix of compliant venues that speak to that ledger.

Broker-dealers, ATSs, and traditional market centers will compete with wallet-native venues and whitelisted AMMs that plug into transfer agent hooks.

The SEC has not granted a bespoke path for AMMs to trade NMS securities, and any AMM that routes orders in NMS securities WOULD need to comply with existing frameworks such as Reg ATS, fair access, surveillance obligations, and short-sale rules.

Agency statements have stressed that tokenization is not a shortcut and that market integrity rules still apply.

Plumbing around the new rails is starting to connect

DTCC launched a tokenized collateral platform and briefed the SEC’s crypto Task Force on tokenization services that could extend into pledging and corporate action workflows, according to DTCC public materials and SEC documentation.

Nasdaq filed to enable tokenized securities trading on its main market when rights are equivalent, with a timeline as soon as the third quarter of 2026 if DTC infrastructure is ready, according to Reuters.

These efforts point to a hybrid stage in which DTC-eligible positions coexist with tokenized cap table entries, and in which conversion or pledge functions bridge the two. Issuers seeking broader distribution may rely on this bridge for street-name positions while operating primary issuance windows on-chain in stablecoins.

Issuance workflow is the immediate change. Superstate’s Direct Issuance lets companies raise capital directly to wallets, take stablecoin proceeds, and record new ownership on-chain under the transfer agent’s supervision.

Follow-ons and at-the-market programs can run outside traditional market hours, with T≈0 settlement and programmable constraints such as transfer restrictions or on-chain accreditation checks. For small and mid-cap issuers, that may expand addressable demand in non-U.S. time zones once compliant venues, KYC pipelines, and custodial options are live.

For investors, the custody model flips from omnibus street name at brokers to wallet-native beneficial ownership tied to the transfer agent’s ledger, subject to whitelisting and rescission powers required for regulatory and sanctions compliance.

Secondary trading is the constraint

Backpack’s plan points to a centralized access LAYER for tokenized stocks outside the U.S., while U.S. flows hinge on broker-dealer and ATS permissions applied to tokens that are the actual securities.

AMMs are technically straightforward on-chain, yet their regulatory status is unresolved for NMS. Three outcomes frame 2026: whitelisted AMMs recognized as ATSs, AMMs restricted and centralized order books dominate, or a hybrid in which AMMs operate for non-NMS or smaller issuers while NMS stays on central limit order books.

The SEC’s posture, including Commissioner statements, emphasizes that tokenization must fit within the existing regulatory perimeter rather than invent a separate lane.

The RTA’s expanded role is the throughline. With the blockchain as the master securityholder file, transfer agents mediate whitelist controls, error correction, rescission, and audit trails for on-chain transfers.

That places agents at the chokepoints for corporate actions and governance. Wallets and venues with strong KYC and sanctions tooling become distribution partners that can feed the master file with clean data.

Stablecoin issuers benefit from primary settlement volumes, and custodians will adapt to hold tokens directly or through controlled wallet architectures that meet Rule 15c3-3 and similar custody expectations when broker-dealers intermediate.

A practical question for issuers is how tokenized shares interplay with DTC positions. DTCC’s tokenization programs focus first on collateral, with scope to extend into securities workflows.

Nasdaq’s filing assumes that DTC infrastructure is ready before token-settled trades sit on the same order book.

Until a seamless conversion path is in production, many issuers may maintain parallel rails, using DTC for mainstream exchange trading and using on-chain issuance for targeted capital formation, dividend distribution experiments, or controlled secondary transfers among whitelisted wallets.

The bridge timing will determine how quickly on-chain liquidity can reach parity with street-name liquidity.

The metrics to watch are straightforward

How many issuers enroll in Superstate’s Opening Bell stack, how many shares outstanding become token transferable, and how many on-chain holders appear on the master file, which Superstate says it maintains as a registered transfer agent.

How much primary issuance settles in stablecoins each month? How much volume Backpack and other compliant venues route for tokenized equities, especially in non-U.S. markets? How DTCC’s tokenized collateral network scales and whether DTC conversion or corporate action bridges for tokenized equity enter testing.

Each data point will describe whether this is primarily a settlement upgrade or the start of a new order Flow channel.

The 2026 setup is bound by the public milestones and today’s working systems. Galaxy’s tokenization demonstrates that issuers can issue real shares on-chain under transfer agent control. Superstate’s Direct Issuance opens wallet-native primaries with stablecoin cash legs.

DTCC and Nasdaq have articulated timelines that could make token legs visible within mainstream market plumbing by late 2026, if the infrastructure aligns. SEC staff have already made room for on-chain master files, while broader secondary trading permissions remain under review.

That leaves a hybrid market structure through 2026, with stablecoin settlement, whitelisted wallets, and transfer agents anchoring cap tables as venues compete to control the order flow that sits on top.

2026 scenario Issuers Token-enabled float Daily on-chain volume Trading structure
Conservative 5–8 $0.5–1.5B $2–8M CLOB venues dominate while on-chain used for primaries and controlled transfers
Base case 12–20 $3–7B $15–40M Hybrid, stablecoin-settled primaries common, early bridges to DTC
Bull 30–50 $10–25B $80–200M Whitelisted AMMs run as ATS analogs alongside exchange order books

Issuers, transfer agents, venues, and infrastructure providers now have a working path to move SEC-registered shares from DTCC-only rails to public blockchains.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.