EU Stands Firm: Commission Shuts Down Big Tech’s Plea to Delay AI Act

Brussels draws a hard line—no more stalling.

Tech giants wanted more time. They didn’t get it. The European Commission just slammed the door on delaying the AI Act, signaling regulators are done playing nice with Silicon Valley’s timeline.

Why it matters: This isn’t just policy—it’s power. The EU’s move tightens the leash on AI development, forcing companies to comply or face penalties. No more 'move fast and break things' when the rules are already written.

The subtext? Follow the money. Delays mean more unregulated profit windows for AI deployments—something Brussels clearly isn’t keen to hand out like free VC funding.

Bottom line: The AI gold rush just got stricter referees. Good luck lobbying your way out of this one, Big Tech.

EU rejects industry calls to delay AI law

Thomas Regnier, a commission spokesperson, clarified in a press briefing that the legislation will proceed exactly as planned. That means the EU will not consider a pause, grace period, or postponement, despite mounting complaints about compliance costs and operational burdens.

“I’ve seen, indeed, a lot of reporting, a lot of letters, and a lot of things being said on the AI Act. Let me be as clear as possible: there is no stop the clock. There is no grace period. There is no pause,” Regnier stated.

The AI Act will be the world’s first comprehensive framework for regulating artificial intelligence and was officially adopted earlier this year after intense negotiations among the EU’s 27 member states and institutions.

The Act categorizes AI systems by risk level and imposes progressively stricter obligations based on that classification. It particularly targets general-purpose AI (GPAI) models and high-risk applications such as biometric surveillance and critical infrastructure.

Provisions of the law began taking effect in February of 2025. Obligations for general-purpose AI models will begin in August 2025, while the strictest rules that target high-risk AI systems will apply starting in August 2026.

In recent days, major U.S. firms such as Google’s parent company Alphabet and Meta, as well as European firms like Dutch semiconductor giant ASML and French AI startup Mistral, have urged the Commission to delay the law’s implementation, with some even proposing delays of several years.

These companies are arguing that the regulatory burdens imposed by the AI Act may stifle innovation and unfairly penalize smaller players who lack the legal and financial resources to navigate complex compliance frameworks.

Several have also raised alarm over the law’s extraterritorial implications, which could affect non-EU developers whose models are deployed within the Union.

The Commission acknowledged the challenges raised by stakeholders and is pursuing a parallel effort to streamline broader digital regulations in the EU. According to Regnier, a proposal to simplify and reduce administrative reporting obligations is expected by the end of 2025.

However, this initiative is separate from the AI Act and is not intended to delay or weaken its Core provisions.

“We understand that small companies have different capacities, and we want to ensure rules are proportionate,” Regnier said. “But this does not mean pausing the AI Act or rewriting the legal timelines already in place.”

The bloc sees its legal frameworks as a template that could influence global standards, much as its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has done in the privacy and data protection industry.

The AI Act also introduces fines reaching up to €35M or 7% of global turnover, depending on the severity of non-compliance or violation.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast