Google Faces $4.7B EU Android Antitrust Showdown—Is Big Tech’s Dominance Crumbling?

Brussels draws blood as Google's appeal against a record-breaking antitrust fine hits the ropes. The tech giant's Android empire—and its grip on mobile dominance—hangs in the balance.

Subheader: The $4.7 Billion Question

EU regulators aren't playing nice. After slapping Google with the penalty in 2018 for allegedly strong-arming manufacturers into pre-installing apps, the appeals court seems poised to deliver a knockout blow. No surprise—when has Brussels ever met a tech giant it didn’t want to tax, fine, or break up?

Subheader: Silicon Valley’s Regulatory Reckoning

This isn’t just about search bars and app stores. It’s a proxy war against Big Tech’s ‘move fast and monopolize’ playbook. Meanwhile, Google’s legal team is sweating harder than a startup’s CFO during a bear market.

Closer: Whether the fine sticks or not, one thing’s clear—regulators now treat tech like banks after 2008: guilty until proven solvent.

Commission acts on Android antitrust concerns

The fine is the legacy of a 2018 determination by the European Commission. At the center of the case is Google’s Android operating software, which runs about three-fourths of the world’s smartphones.

The Commission said the tech firm Leveraged the dominance of Android to force handset makers to enter into restrictive contracts. These contracts stipulated that manufacturers must pre-install Google’s apps, including Chrome and Search, as a condition of being able to feature the Play Store. The EU claimed this was unfair to rivals and restricted consumer choice.

At the time, Margrethe Vestager, the Commission’s competition chief, said that Google had used Android to cement its search engine’s dominance.

The EU’s €4.34 billion fine was the largest ever levied against a single company. In 2022, the EU’s General Court trimmed it slightly to €4.125 billion but confirmed the main points.

The tech firm fought back by appealing to the ECJ, the EU’s highest court. The tech firm has defended its practices throughout the legal battle, asserting they are good for users and manufacturers.

The company has countered that Android drives innovation and competition because it allows device makers to create custom experiences while offering access to popular Google services. It also noted that users can install substitute apps if they wish.

In earlier comments, the tech company said it was pleased that the Commission agreed Android was an open platform and WOULD remain so.

But EU regulators have maintained their position. They say Google’s licensing terms unfairly closed off competition and entrenched its power in search and mobile browsers.

The internet giant did not immediately comment on Kokott’s opinion on Thursday.

EU steps up tech regulation

The case is among Europe’s regulators’ broader crackdown on Big Tech. The European Union has emerged as one of the world’s most aggressive watchdogs over digital competition, privacy, and the accountability of platforms.

Google has already been fined multiple times in the European Union, to the tune of more than €8 billion. Besides the Android case, the company has been fined for Google Shopping and AdSense.

More recently, the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a sweeping EU legislation that started applying in 2024, has stricter rules for major tech players like Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta. They aim to prevent large platforms from preferencing their services or detaining consumers in their ecosystems.

Decisions like the Android ruling could help define how far the European Union will be able to push the tech giants on competition law grounds.

Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More