Aussie Crypto Traders Could Reclaim Billions in Landmark Tax Ruling—Tax Office Braces for Impact

Australian cryptocurrency investors might be sitting on an unexpected windfall—billions in potential tax refunds—after a groundbreaking court decision challenges the ATO’s aggressive stance on crypto transactions.

The case centers on whether crypto-to-crypto trades should be treated as taxable events—a policy that’s been draining portfolios (and patience) since 2014. If overturned, the ruling could force the tax office to repay years of disputed levies—plus interest.

Funny how regulators suddenly discover ’flexibility’ when courts threaten their revenue streams. Meanwhile, traders keep better records than the banks they’re supposedly disrupting.

A Bitcoin theft case with major tax implications

The case involved the criminal trial of William Wheatley, a former Australian Federal Police officer (AFP), who in 2019 allegedly stole 81.6 Bitcoins during a drug investigation. At the time, the stolen Bitcoin was worth around AUD 730,000. Today, that same stash is valued at over AUD 20 million (USD 13 million), highlighting just how much Bitcoin has appreciated.

But it wasn’t the theft that raised eyebrows in the crypto and legal communities; it was Victorian magistrate Michael O’Connell’s interpretation of what bitcoin actually is.

In delivering the ruling, the judge referred to Bitcoin as property of a similar nature to the Australian dollar (AUD) rather than a speculative asset, such as a foreign currency, shares, or gold, which is how the ATO currently treats it for taxation purposes.

Wheatley’s defence team is basing its argument on the claim that Bitcoin is information, a credit entry in a ledger in software, and not a property, meaning it can’t be stolen.

Challenging the ATO’s capital gains framework

The ATO currently classifies cryptocurrencies as assets, meaning that any time they are sold, exchanged, or even used to purchase goods and services, the holders who deal with the digital assets are expected to calculate and pay capital gains tax.

However, if Bitcoin is legally considered a currency like the AUD, as the judge suggested, then those gains could fall outside of the ATO’s capital gains tax regime.

While the judge didn’t explicitly speak on its tax implications, it can be subject to varying interpretations. This has led analysts to say that the case could potentially go to the Australian High Courts for further conclusion on what the ruling means for the tax body, and if Bitcoin can be considered a property.

According to legal professionals, this new interpretation of Bitcoin, if upheld in the higher courts, could force a complete rethink of the tax treatment of crypto in Australia. It could even open the door for retrospective claims, with investors potentially eligible to reclaim taxes paid on past crypto transactions, amounting to billions of dollars.

The judgment makes a case for theft, and Wheatley has appealed against the judge’s decision to consider Bitcoin as property.

The ATO and crypto holders have conflicting interests

The implications for the ATO and over 1.9 million taxpayers who have a crypto asset account with an Australian crypto asset exchange aren’t clear yet.

The ATO has also said that it doesn’t have data on the exact amount that has been paid as tax on Bitcoin transactions, as it bundles it with other income and CGT reporting. This may add an extra strain to potential refunds should the case go on to require the ATO to make refunds.

However, while there may be some form of Optimism in the camp of crypto holders, legal commentators warn that the ruling doesn’t automatically change the law. It will take either a definitive legal challenge or new legislation to codify Bitcoin’s status as money and determine its tax treatment.

Cryptopolitan Academy: Coming Soon - A New Way to Earn Passive Income with DeFi in 2025. Learn More