BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptopolitan /
POLYCON’S CRITICAL MOVE: Can PIP-85’s Fee Restructuring Reverse Polygon’s 60% Token Collapse?

POLYCON’S CRITICAL MOVE: Can PIP-85’s Fee Restructuring Reverse Polygon’s 60% Token Collapse?

Published:
2026-03-26 16:33:30
15
1

Polygon's leadership has issued a stark proposal to overhaul its fee structure, aiming to stem a catastrophic 60% plunge in its native POL token and reclaim dominance from surging rivals Base and Arbitrum. The PIP-85 plan, authored by founder Sandeep Nailwal and published March 25, 2026, seeks to redirect 50% of priority fee revenue to validators in a dramatic bid to restore network competitiveness and investor confidence.

Why are Polygon’s validators and delegators at odds?

The PIP-85 system is a fee system that has grown to be one-sided, according to the authors of the proposal. Since the launch of its current fee framework, PIP-65, priority fees on the L2 platform have gone up tenfold, with more than 5.4 million POL tokens distributed to validators in February alone. 

Despite these commercial successes, delegators who lock up capital to back validations and enable their privileged position on the network do not enjoy any of that windfall.

According to the proposal, “Delegators are not seeing these fees passed on in any meaningful manner, and there is great variability in the reward distribution amongst the validator set.”

What exactly does PIP-85 propose to change?

Under PIP-85, 50% of the validator priority fee pool would be redirected to stakers. The proposal calls on Polygon’s staking interface and third-party integrators to incorporate claiming mechanisms directly into their platforms.

The remaining validator pool would also be restructured with 75% distributed on an equal-weighted, performance-adjusted basis, favoring validators by their contribution instead of their stake size. The remaining 25% will be distributed under the existing stake-weight formula. 

The authors mentioned in the proposal that no direct on-chain changes are required to implement the proposal.

Can a fee fix address Polygon’s competitive challenges?

The tokenomics revision arrives against a difficult competitive backdrop not just for Polygon alone but for the entire layer-2 ecosystem. 

Base, the network built by Coinbase, has risen to the top in the Ethereum layer-2 sector by total value locked (TVL) at over $4.08 billion, as seen on DefiLlama. Arbitrum comes second with a TVL of about $1.97 billion. Polygon comes fourth with $1.26 billion in TVL, trailing Plasma, which comes third with over $1.45 billion in TVL.

Polygon moves to reverse 60% one-year downtrend with fee model proposal

Comparison of Ethereum L2s by TVL. Source: Defillama

Despite its current position, Polygon has not stood still on the technical side, as it announced that it had activated the Lisovo Hardfork on mainnet earlier in March. The hardfork introduces gas subsidies for AI agents and improves transaction reliability.

A series of upgrades through 2025 pushed throughput from approximately 1,000 to a target of 5,000 transactions per second. The network has seen significant growth in its enterprise network, with Revolut and, most recently, Mastercard joining other major financial institutions that have integrated Polygon’s on-chain payment infrastructure.

On Defillama, Polygon seems to be doing well following the proposal’s announcement, as the daily chain fees generated over the past 24 hours have seen a rise. The platform generated over $71,000, trailing only Base, which generated over $76,000, in the L2 space.

How this proposed pivot reverses the fortunes of POL is the question observers will be looking to get answers for soon.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.