BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptopolitan /
Dragonfly Capital Founders Feud Erupts: Haseeb Qureshi and Alexander Pack Clash in Crypto VC Power Struggle

Dragonfly Capital Founders Feud Erupts: Haseeb Qureshi and Alexander Pack Clash in Crypto VC Power Struggle

Published:
2026-02-26 15:45:44
18
3

Dragonfly capital founders feud erupts as Haseeb Qureshi and Alexander Pack clash

Dragonfly Capital's boardroom battle spills into public view as founding partners Haseeb Qureshi and Alexander Pack trade accusations over fund strategy and governance—just as the crypto market hits another inflection point.

The Silicon Valley whisper network turned into a shouting match this week when leaked internal communications revealed deep fractures between two of crypto's most influential investors. Sources close to the firm describe escalating tensions about portfolio concentration, risk exposure, and that age-old venture capital dilemma: whether to double down or diversify.

Portfolio Whiplash

While neither founder disclosed specific figures, the dispute reportedly centers on Dragonfly's billion-dollar-plus assets under management. Qureshi's public advocacy for decentralized infrastructure projects appears to conflict with Pack's alleged preference for more concentrated bets in DeFi blue-chips—a classic growth-stage versus early-stage philosophical divide.

VC Drama Meets Market Reality

The timing couldn't be more symbolic. As regulatory clarity emerges and institutional capital floods the space, internal governance failures at top-tier funds threaten to undermine the very legitimacy crypto VCs have spent years building. One rival fund manager quipped, "Nothing says 'professional asset management' like founders airing dirty laundry while collecting 2-and-20."

Dragonfly's internal struggle mirrors the broader industry's growing pains—proving that even in decentralized finance, old-fashioned human conflict remains the most reliable smart contract.

Who truly founded Dragonfly Capital?

Haseeb Qureshi, Managing Partner at Dragonfly, posted an extensive 13-lesson guide on X (formerly Twitter) detailing how to create a successful venture capital (VC) firm. In his post, Qureshi detailed his journey of joining forces with Bo Feng to build Dragonfly from the ground up during the 2018 crypto winter. He described using a fake-it-till-you-make-it strategy, claiming the firm originally had no brand and no ability to lead deals.

In the comments of his post, Alexander Pack, a former partner at the firm, accused Qureshi of rewriting history. 

“Haseeb, it’s very simple. You wrote a post about how to start a VC. You lied about starting the VC. You have never started a VC firm in your life.” Pack wrote.

Pack stated that he and Bo Feng had co-founded Dragonfly more than a year before Qureshi was hired. According to Pack, the firm was already operational, had a $100 million fund, and had already participated in several high-profile deals.

To support his claim, Pack referenced a 2018 Forbes announcement that explicitly names “Alexander Pack and Bo Feng” as the founders of Dragonfly. 

The article stated that the duo was looking to invest $100 million into a mix of crypto-first funds and protocols. At the time of that publication, Qureshi was listed as a General Partner at MetaStable Capital, an entity Dragonfly had actually invested in. 

In a response to defend himself, Qureshi clarified that while the fund had been announced, it had not been fully raised when he joined. He also maintained that he was responsible for shifting the firm away from a fund-of-funds model toward a direct-investment powerhouse.

Through the series of exchanges, Qureshi stated that Pack is no longer welcome at the firm and alleged that Pack’s departure from the company four years ago involved him lying to people about deals.  

What were Qureshi’s early contributions? 

Qureshi’s 13 lessons emphasize that VC is a people business and that personal distribution, like a social media presence and engaging in public storytelling, is a requirement for modern firms. 

His post mentioned that firms like a16z are often viewed as media businesses with a venture arm. However, a focus on personal branding can create friction when multiple parties feel their contributions to that brand are being erased or undervalued.

In his exchange with Pack, Qureshi argued that even if Dragonfly existed as a legal entity, the company currently recognized by the market was built through the specific strategies he implemented, such as Dragonfly Research. 

When Dragonfly Capital launched, they had little brand recognition in the competitive VC landscape, and so they branded themselves as a research-driven fund in order to stand out. 

The research was simply Haseeb Qureshi republishing his deep-dive explainers and speculative “wouldn’t it be crazy if” posts that he used to write for his personal blog under the Dragonfly Research banner.

The strategy eventually helped them win deals and attract founders before they had a long track record of successful exits. 

Dragonfly Research eventually evolved into a legitimate department that publishes extensive data-heavy reports, such as the State of Airdrops Report and Crypto Compensation Reports, which use proprietary data to analyze how much crypto workers are paid or how airdrops affect long-term token health.

The team now includes data scientists, legal experts, and other researchers who publish under the same banner. 

Despite media reports suggesting that institutional interest in crypto has waned, Dragonfly recently launched its $650 million Fund IV. Currently, the company manages roughly $4 billion and has 45 employees spread across New York, San Francisco, and Singapore. 

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.