Apple and Google Agree to UK App Store Reforms: Tech Giants Bow to Regulatory Pressure

London's digital marketplace braces for a seismic shift as Silicon Valley's gatekeepers unlock their walled gardens.

The Regulatory Hammer Drops

Facing mounting pressure from the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, Apple and Google have formally committed to sweeping changes in their app store operations. This isn't a voluntary gesture—it's a strategic retreat. The reforms aim to dismantle key aspects of their control, potentially rerouting billions in digital commerce.

What's Actually Changing?

The core of the agreement targets the infamous 'Apple Tax' and Google's parallel fees. Developers will gain the right to use alternative payment systems, bypassing the platforms' native—and lucrative—transaction rails. This cuts directly at a revenue stream that has fueled astronomical valuations for years. Furthermore, app makers will get more freedom to communicate directly with users about offers and subscriptions outside the official stores, a practice previously strictly policed.

The Ripple Effect Beyond Tech

This concession signals a new era of enforced interoperability. It's a blueprint other regulators—from Brussels to Washington—are likely to examine closely. For fintech and crypto apps, long chafing under restrictive in-app purchase rules, this could be the crack in the dam needed for broader adoption and innovative monetization models. Watch for a surge in direct-to-consumer payment integrations and subscription models that finally escape the 30% vig.

A Cynical Finance Take

Let's be real—this 'openness' was priced in about three antitrust lawsuits ago. The market's already baking in lower future services margins, betting the giants will just find more creative ways to monetize your data instead. True disruption happens when you build a new table, not when you're reluctantly allowed a slightly better chair at the old one.

The gates are creaking open. Now we see who actually walks through.

The CMA expresses satisfaction with Google and Apple’s recent decision 

Analysts found that a larger share of smartphones in Britain run either Google’s Android or Apple’s iOS. Moreover, the tech giant’s app stores and browsers establish a dominant, anti-competitive position on these platforms.

To curb this unethical practice, the CMA noted that the two companies will ensure app evaluations are equitable, objective, and transparent as part of their new commitments. 

Developers will also be granted the opportunity to request access to additional features in Apple’s iOS to facilitate the creation of rival products, such as those connected to digital wallets or live translation. 

Meanwhile, regarding Google and Apple’s decision, it is worth noting that this announcement marked the first changes US tech firms have vowed to implement since the UK enforced its digital markets rules last year.

In a statement, a representative from Apple mentioned that, “The commitments we announced today will help Apple keep improving important privacy and security features for users, as well as create great opportunities for developers.” 

Reports alleged that any regulatory inquiry could lead to enforcement actions, such as penalties or fines, to promote a competitive mobile landscape. Regarding the tech giant’s app store’s contribution to the nation’s economy, the CMA highlighted that the British app economy accounts for approximately 1.5% of total GDP.

In the meantime, Google and Apple intend to implement these changes as soon as April this year, following the CMA’s market assessment. Google’s spokesperson noted that its app store policies are governed by fair, objective, and transparent practices and that these commitments are designed to collectively address the regulator’s concerns.

Apple is set to face a lawsuit for antitrust violations in a Dutch court 

In December last year, the highest court in Europe pointed to the possibility of Apple being sued for antitrust violations in a Dutch court. This announcement followed reports that two foundations were seeking a potential settlement worth hundreds of millions of euros in compensation for users potentially impacted by the tech giant’s alleged unfair practices in its app store. 

In a statement, Apple’s spokesperson criticized the court’s decision, asserting that the court lacked proper jurisdiction. Afterwards, the company maintained that it WOULD mount a vigorous defense against the allegations, which it dismisses as lacking evidence.

Notably, the case was presented to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) after a Dutch court sought expert guidance on damages claims from the Right to Consumer Justice and App Stores Claims foundations.

He further noted that a hearing on the substantive issues of the case is scheduled for the end of the first quarter of 2026 in a Dutch court.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.