Waymo Doubles Down on Safety, Rejects Tesla’s Camera-Only Approach as Autonomous Race Heats Up

In the high-stakes world of self-driving cars, one company is taking the scenic route—and betting it's the only road to real safety.

The Sensor Wars Escalate

Waymo just threw a massive wrench into the 'vision-only' narrative. While Tesla pushes its camera-centric Autopilot and Full Self-Driving suite, Waymo's latest move signals a stark philosophical divide. It's not just about adding more hardware; it's a fundamental clash over what 'safe enough' really means for a robotaxi fleet.

Beyond the Marketing Hype

The industry's been buzzing with promises of software updates that will someday unlock true autonomy. Waymo's stance cuts through that noise. Their playbook reads less like a Silicon Valley moonshot and more like a rigorous engineering manifesto. Lidar, radar, and a suite of redundant systems aren't optional extras—they're the non-negotiable foundation. It's a capital-intensive path that makes venture capitalists sweat, but one they argue is the only way to build public trust at scale.

The Bottom Line on Safety

This isn't academic. Every disengagement, every cautious merge, every redundant sensor is a line item on a balance sheet. Waymo's approach essentially argues that you can't shortcut your way to a flawless safety record—or to regulatory approval. It's a direct challenge to the notion that AI brilliance alone can overcome physical-world limitations. For now, they're betting that consumers, and eventually regulators, will pay a premium for the vehicle that sees the world in more than just pixels.

The Road Ahead

The race isn't just to launch a service, but to define the safety standard that becomes law. Waymo's rejection of the minimalist vision is a gamble that thoroughness will beat frugality. In a sector where one high-profile failure can tank an entire industry's reputation, their message is clear: in autonomy, the safety margin is the only margin that matters. After all, what's the valuation of a company that moves fast and breaks things... when the 'things' are passengers?

Nobody knows what ‘safe enough’ actually means

The hardware tells you everything. Tesla wants fewer than 10 cameras and AI trained on billions of driving miles. Waymo robotaxis carry 29 cameras, five lidars, and six radars. About 2,500 Waymo vehicles operate across U.S. cities now. The next version coming by late 2026 drops to 13 cameras, four lidars, and six radars. Still keeping lidar.

The tension is cost versus safety. More sensors cost more money, which makes it harder to scale to millions of vehicles. Fewer sensors might create safety problems that regulators and riders won’t accept. Thirumalai said Waymo decides what safety level it needs, then figures out how to cut sensor costs and improve the software. He thinks the setup will change in three to five years, but won’t drop lidar just because it’s expensive.

What counts as SAFE enough? Nobody really knows. Thirumalai admitted Waymo is still working that out. They don’t promise robots will be twice or five times safer than humans. They look at specific driving situations, check how often they happen per million miles, then try to beat that rate.

Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana already said a robotaxi will eventually kill someone. It’s not if, it’s when.

Safety data shows stark differences in crash rates

Waymo told senators its cars had 10 times fewer serious crashes than human drivers over the same distance, per Cryptopolitan’s earlier reporting. That data came from an independent audit covering 200 million autonomous miles. Tesla reported its Full Self-Driving cars average 5.1 million miles between major crashes. The national average for human drivers is 699,000 miles.

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said Waymo’s tech works but costs more than Tesla’s camera system. The price difference matters when both companies need tens of thousands of cars to match millions of human Uber drivers.

Videos keep showing up online of autonomous vehicles screwing up in school zones, around emergency vehicles, in bad weather, during regular drives. Thirumalai said expecting AI to never make mistakes isn’t realistic.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.