BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptopolitan /
CEOs vs Security Chiefs: The AI Risk-Reward Rift Deepens in 2026

CEOs vs Security Chiefs: The AI Risk-Reward Rift Deepens in 2026

Published:
2026-01-16 16:10:14
13
3

CEOs and security chiefs split on AI’s risks and rewards

Boardroom battles over artificial intelligence are reaching fever pitch. The C-suite is splitting right down the middle.

The Innovation Imperative vs. The Security Siege

CEOs see AI as the ultimate competitive edge—a tool to slash operational costs, personalize customer experiences at scale, and unlock revenue streams that don't even exist yet. They're racing to deploy, driven by a fear of missing the next technological epoch. Every quarter without AI integration feels like leaving money on the table for a rival to scoop up.

Security chiefs, however, are staring down a nightmare. Every new AI model is another potential attack vector, a data leakage risk, or an ungovernable system making decisions no human fully understands. They see the rush to implement as a corporate adrenaline shot with unknown long-term side effects. Their mandate is to protect the castle, while the CEO orders them to dismantle the walls for a better view.

The Trust Gap Widens

This isn't just a technical debate; it's a fundamental clash of priorities. Growth versus governance. Speed versus safety. One side is incentivized by market share and stock price—the other by regulatory compliance and breach prevention. It's a classic case of the people writing the checks and the people managing the fallout speaking entirely different languages. (Much like a trader explaining blockchain 'utility' to a skeptical central banker.)

The real risk? Companies that let this divide go unresolved. Organizations that don't build security into their AI DNA from the ground up are crafting their own crises. The winners won't be those who move fastest or lock down tightest—but those who manage to align these two warring factions. The future belongs to enterprises that can innovate without inviting catastrophe. The alternative is a headline waiting to happen.

A split in leadership views

250 CEOs and CISOs from the US and the UK are included in the study. The results showed a sharp difference in viewpoints. CEOs see AI primarily as a tool to work quickly and surpass their competitors, while CISOs are more concerned about potential issues like data breaches.

This difference is clear in how much each group trusts the technology. When asked if they believe AI will actually make their companies safer, about 19.5% of CEOs said they were not confident.

On the other hand, 30% of security personnel shared this sentiment. According to Tizzio, a lot of executives are now questioning the particular technologies they are purchasing for their companies because AI is developing so swiftly.

Leaders’ sense of preparedness is also influenced by geography. Although 85% of American CEOs think they are prepared for AI-related risks, just 44% of their U.K. counterparts share this opinion.

Rising budgets for digital safety

Despite these worries, funding for internet safety is still a key priority. Eighty-two percent of those surveyed intend to increase their security budgets in the upcoming year due to the nearly twofold increase in ransomware cases over the past two years. Tizzio concluded that protecting against these digital threats is now a regular part of every conversation regarding a company’s health.

Building on the Axis Capital findings, the recently released World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 confirms a deepening rift in corporate leadership. As per a report released on January 12 this year, 94% of leaders currently believe that artificial intelligence will be the main force behind cybersecurity progress in 2026.

There has been a clear shift in focus at the top. For the first time, CEOs are more worried about cyber-enabled fraud than ransomware. While security leaders continue to give operational threats like ransomware assaults first priority, their concerns are increasingly focused on identity theft and AI-driven schemes.

Because of this mismatch in viewpoint, leadership teams in international businesses are facing new, often misguided expectations due to the financial and human risks associated with AI, despite advancements in technology security.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.