Token Buybacks Set to Explode in 2026 as Crypto Projects Scramble to Establish Price Floors

Forget dividends—crypto's new favorite financial engineering trick is hitting the gas.

The Buyback Blitz Begins

Projects are quietly shifting treasury strategies. The goal isn't just to build—it's to prop up. When token prices slide, confidence crumbles. A well-timed buyback announcement can be the ultimate market sedative, a signal that the team itself sees value where the market sees fear. It's a defensive play dressed as aggressive growth.

Hunting for the Bottom

This isn't charity; it's calculated. Teams aren't buying at all-time highs. They're waiting, watching order books thin out, then striking to establish a perceived floor. It's price discovery by corporate fiat—a way to whisper "it won't go lower than this" without saying a word. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it just gives insiders a better exit. The oldest rule in traditional finance still applies: follow the money, but question the motive.

The 2026 Catalyst

Why now? Maturation. Many projects launched in the last cycle are exiting lock-ups, facing vesting cliffs, and staring down fully diluted valuations that look… optimistic. A buyback burns tokens, theoretically increasing scarcity. It's a narrative reset, a chance to change the conversation from "when do the founders dump?" to "look how committed they are." A classic pivot from dilution to deletion.

Get ready for the era of the artificial floor—where support isn't found, it's funded. Just another day in digital asset markets, where financial innovation often means repackaging the oldest tricks in the book with a new, decentralized wrapper.

Buybacks are not a business model

Buybacks and token burns have been proposed as a solution to weakening token valuations. The buybacks offset an earlier trend of low-float tokens, which saw their supply bloat over time. 

Based on Artemis data, buybacks may boost success during a bull cycle, but do not guarantee the success of a token. Digital asset buybacks are also different from stock buybacks in that shareholders benefit from a buyback by owning a larger relative share of an existing business. 

Some projects start out with extremely early buybacks and burns, but there is no connection between buybacks and price performance. For instance, Pump.fun bought back over 18% of the PUMP supply, while the token still traded NEAR its lows. 

Buybacks are also mostly concentrated into a small handful of tokens, including JUP, Sky Protocol, BONK, Aave, and a handful of other DeFi apps. For smaller projects, even the mention of a buyback is used to create social media hype. 

Projects with buybacks still underperform the market

Based on Messari data, projects with regular buybacks failed to establish a floor price. Instead, many of those projects underperformed the market. 

Buyback protocols also show different patterns of acquisition, ranging from linear to sporadic, or with weekly or monthly burns. Token burns are not always related to buybacks, as in the case of native protocols, which receive the tokens as a fee and destroy them. Actual buybacks use stablecoins or tokens received as fees, and include buying on the open market. 

Some of the buybacks are also not transparent and may include off-market treasuries, which also do not affect the final price.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.