OpenAI’s Compute Margin Hits 70% in Aggressive Push Toward Profitability

OpenAI just cranked up the pressure. The AI giant is now running at a 70% compute margin—a significant operational squeeze aimed squarely at the bottom line.

The Efficiency Gambit

This isn't about building smarter models. It's about running them cheaper. Every percentage point shaved off infrastructure waste flows directly into the black. The move signals a fundamental shift from pure research sprint to a marathon for sustainable revenue.

Investors are watching the burn rate more closely than the next paper. For a company once synonymous with moonshot ambitions, the new priority is making the math work. It's a classic tech pivot: first you build the future, then you figure out how to pay for it.

The path to profit is paved with optimized silicon. Whether this margin discipline fuels innovation or stifles it remains the billion-dollar question. After all, in the finance world, 'growth at all costs' eventually meets its accountant.

Tracking higher margins and new revenue plans

The Information reported that OpenAI has better compute margins than Anthropic for paid accounts, but Anthropic spends less on servers.

That difference shows how each company handles its computing load as the cost of running large models grows. The company that pushed AI into the mainstream is still trying to reach profit while expanding the scale of its systems.

Sam shared several projections to justify the company’s spending plans.He said the company expects $20 billion in run-rate revenue by the end of this year and wants the number to grow to “hundreds of billion” by 2030.He shared the comments on social media, which he often uses to outline his view of the business.

Sam also listed new areas the company might enter next, like consumer devices, robotics work, and selling cloud compute space to other firms.

Responding to funding questions and bailout concerns

The company’s spending faced new questions when Sarah Friar, the chief financial officer, spoke at a tech event in Napa, California. The conversation shifted when Sarah used the word “backstop.”

Sarah said the company WOULD use banks and private equity to support its trillion-dollar AI plan. Then she added that there might be a possible “governmental” step to “backstop the guarantee that allows the financing to happen.”

The comment drew strong reactions from people watching the industry. Some pointed to an interview from weeks earlier where Sam said the US government could serve as the “ultimate insurer” if AI was misused.

Sam later said that he was talking about harm caused by bad actors, not data center funding. The issue reached Washington, where White House AI and crypto chief David Sacks said, “There will be no federal bailout for AI.”

Join Bybit now and claim a $50 bonus in minutes