FTC Moves to Settle $186M Nomad Crypto Hack Case - Regulatory Waters Churn in 2025
The FTC just dropped a hammer on one of crypto's most infamous heists. Settlement talks are underway for the Nomad bridge exploit—a $186 million reminder that code is law, until regulators decide it isn't.
The Bridge That Burned
Nomad pitched itself as a secure passage between blockchains. Hackers treated it like an open vault. They didn't crack a sophisticated cipher; they exploited a routine upgrade. A single misconfigured line of code let attackers drain funds in a chaotic, copycat frenzy. It wasn't a surgical strike—it was a digital bank run broadcast live on-chain.
The $186 Million Question
That eye-watering sum didn't vanish into some anonymous void. Blockchain's transparency became its own forensic tool. The FTC's move signals a shift: treating these exploits not as unavoidable 'acts of God' in DeFi, but as potential failures in consumer protection. The message is clear—builders are accountable, even in a decentralized world.
Security Theater vs. Real Fort Knox
The industry's response post-hack was a masterclass in crisis management. Audits got stricter, bug bounties got bigger, and 'trust-minimized' became every bridge's favorite buzzword. But real security is boring. It's rigorous, peer-reviewed code and conservative, over-collateralized designs. It doesn't make for catchy marketing.
The New Rules of the Game
This settlement isn't an endpoint; it's a precedent. Regulators are reading the blockchain ledger, and they're sending invoices. For the next wave of builders, the calculus changes. Innovation must now be weighed against a new cost: regulatory scrutiny. It's a tax on moving fast and breaking things—finally making some venture capitalists sweat the downside.
The Nomad saga closes a chapter, but the book on crypto security is being rewritten in real-time. The tech promises autonomy, while the FTC insists on accountability. The only thing settling faster than this case might be the naive belief that in finance, even the decentralized kind, someone isn't eventually keeping score.
Nomad crypto hack incident raises safety concerns among crypto investors
The FTC mentioned in its original complaint that Nomad failed to effectively prevent the hack because it lacked the right incident response systems in place. According to the agency, “They had to depend on an engineer who was on a plane to send code snippets back and forth with the incident manager. Because of this delay, Nomad couldn’t shut down the bridge until after it lost all its assets.”
In the proposed agreement, the FTC highlighted that it decided to submit a Complaint, indicating the charges, after discovering sufficient evidence to support its claim that the Respondent had breached the Federal Trade Commission Act.
This conclusion followed a thorough investigation into the matter that was conducted by the commission. “The Commission has accepted the signed Consent Agreement and made it public for 30 days to allow for public comments,” the agency added.
Meanwhile, established in 2021, Nomad operated as a blockchain bridge that enabled users to transfer tokens across various blockchain networks, including ethereum and Avalanche.
According to a report from the FTC, a code update implemented in June 2022 resulted in a major defect in one of the smart contracts on Nomad. Hackers began to take advantage of the situation on August 1, 2022, resulting in substantial losses of approximately $186 million in Ethereum, USDC, DAI, and WBTC.
Illusory Systems had marketed Nomad as a Safety-focused platform, according to the agency’s complaint. However, the commission argued that they failed to properly test the code or keep clear processes for reporting suspicious incidents and responding to them.
The FTC accuses Illusory Systems of ignoring basic safety measures
The federal agency alleged that Illusory Systems failed to establish basic safety measures that could have mitigated the losses clients faced and did not comply with established secure coding practices, such as conducting proper unit tests before introducing the code.
The FTC stated that although Nomad pointed out that it had adopted thorough testing of smart contracts in its advertising, Nomad engineers admitted that the platform did not frequently test them adequately before the hack took place.
After the hack incident, Nomad was able to recover around $22 million of the $190 million that was robbed. This situation illustrates a growing trend in the cryptocurrency industry, where criminals often steal substantial sums of clients’ funds. To support this claim, Israeli authorities reported earlier this year that they managed to arrest Alexander Gurevich for supposedly starting the Nomad bridge exploit.
Reports from the police stated that Gurevich was caught at an Israel-based airport while attempting to flee to Moscow just a few days after he lawfully changed his name to remain hidden from the authorities.
Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
