Play and Earn Big: Dropee Daily Combo Unleashes Crypto Rewards on October 24, 2025
Gamers Strike Digital Gold in Latest Play-to-Earn Revolution
The Crypto Gaming Frontier Expands
Dropee's latest daily combo transforms screen time into earning potential—turning casual gameplay into serious crypto accumulation. Players worldwide are discovering that their gaming skills now translate directly to digital asset growth.
While traditional finance still debates blockchain legitimacy, Dropee users are quietly building portfolios one game session at a time. Because nothing says financial innovation like getting paid to play while Wall Street fund managers charge 2-and-20 for underperforming the S&P 500.
The revolution isn't coming—it's already in your hands.
Consumers seeking billions from Google following $425 million verdict
U.S. Google users who secured a $425 million jury verdict last month in a long-running privacy class action are now seeking an additional $2.36 billion from the company. In a new court filing on Wednesday, the plaintiffs asked Chief U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco to order Alphabet’s Google to give up the profits it allegedly earned through data practices the jury found unlawful.
The $2.36 billion in question was described as a “conservative approximation” of the profits Google gained by secretly collecting app activity data from millions of users who had turned off a key tracking feature. The class action is centered on the company’s Web & App Activity setting, which the plaintiffs said misled users into believing their data WOULD not be collected once disabled.
According to the filing, the jury determined that Google’s conduct was “highly offensive, harmful, and without consent.” The plaintiffs argued that the initial damages were “clearly insufficient to remedy the ongoing and irreparable harm that Google’s conduct continues to inflict.” They pointed out that despite the verdict, Google did not alter its privacy disclosures or its data collection practices.
Google has so far denied any wrongdoing and maintains that the data collected was anonymized. A company spokesperson said Google plans to appeal the jury’s verdict. The company has also argued that its privacy settings provide users with meaningful control over their data and that the claims made in the lawsuit misrepresent how its products function.
Google urges to overturn the verdict
In a separate filing also made on Wednesday, Google urged Judge Seeborg to decertify the class of the 98 million users and 174 million devices covered by the lawsuit. The company argued that the case relies on individualized factors, such as the specific apps used and each user’s expectations about privacy, which it said make class treatment inappropriate.
Google also asked the court to vacate the verdict entirely, arguing that there were insufficient common issues to justify a class-wide judgment. The company reiterated its position that no privacy laws were violated and that its practices complied with its user agreements and privacy policies.
The lawsuit, first filed in 2020, alleged that over an eight-year period, Google unlawfully accessed data from users’ mobile devices, including their app usage patterns and personal identifiers, even after they had opted out of tracking through their account settings. Plaintiffs argued this violated federal and state privacy laws, as well as Google’s own representations to users.
The jury ultimately sided with the plaintiffs on two of the three privacy claims, finding that Google’s data collection practices breached user consent and privacy assurances. However, the $425 million verdict was far below the more than $31 billion in damages initially sought at trial.
If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs again, the disgorgement would mark one of the largest financial penalties ever imposed in a U.S. privacy case.
Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
