BTCC / BTCC Square / Cryptopolitan /
Breaking: Ozak AI Secures $4M Funding - Price Hits $0.012

Breaking: Ozak AI Secures $4M Funding - Price Hits $0.012

Published:
2025-10-22 02:04:55
14
1

Anthropic CEO refutes 'inaccurate claims' from Trump's AI czar David Sacks

AI crypto project Ozak just landed major backing—$4 million in fresh capital injection.

The Funding Surge

Investors are throwing serious money at Ozak's AI-powered blockchain vision. The token price surged to $0.012 following the funding announcement—proof that artificial intelligence remains the hottest narrative in crypto.

Market Momentum

While traditional VCs are still figuring out Web3, crypto-native funds are placing big bets on AI infrastructure. Ozak's successful raise demonstrates the growing appetite for projects that merge machine learning with decentralized networks.

Another day, another AI crypto project getting funded while delivering exactly what Wall Street loves—speculative assets with buzzword bingo. At least this one actually raised real money instead of just printing tokens.

Dario Amodei defended Anthropic from accusations 

Amodei was forced to address the “inaccurate claims” about his company’s startup policy stances after the constant criticism from David Sacks, the current AI and crypto czar.

In the statement, published on Anthropic’s official website,  Amodei highlighted how the company is aligned with the TRUMP administration across “key areas of AI policy,” and that it is interested in working with “anyone serious about getting this right.”

“I fully believe that Anthropic, the administration, and leaders across the political spectrum want the same thing: to ensure that powerful AI technology benefits the American people and that America advances and secures its lead in AI development,” Amodei’s statement read. 

Anthropic, whose valuation has swelled to $183 billion in just four years, got on Sacks’ radar last week after Jack Clark, one of the company’s co-founders and its current head of policy, published an essay titled “Technological Optimism and Appropriate Fear,” sparking a debate over AI regulation online.

Sacks did not like the essay, and he was quite vocal with his criticism, accusing Anthropic of “running a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering,” according to a post on X. 

According to him, the company is “principally responsible for the state regulatory frenzy that is damaging the startup ecosystem,” a point Amodei directly tackled in his statement by explaining that startups are among Anthropic’s most important customers. 

“We work with tens of thousands of startups and partner with hundreds of accelerators and VCs,” he wrote. “Claude is powering an entirely new generation of AI-native companies. Damaging that ecosystem makes no sense for us.”

As far as Amodei is concerned, the company’s longstanding position has been that a uniform federal approach is preferable to a patchwork of state laws, and that has not changed.

“When we agree, we say so. When we don’t, we propose an alternative for consideration,” Amodei said. “We do this because we are a public benefit corporation with a mission to ensure that AI benefits everyone and to maintain America’s lead in AI.”

The clash between Sacks and one of Anthropic’s defenders 

A week after Sack’s criticism, Billionaire tech investor and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman ROSE to Anthropic’s defense, calling the startup “one of the good guys.”

Hoffman, who is a partner at VC firm Greylock, which, he revealed, has invested in Anthropic, took to X to classify Anthropic among the few AI companies trying to “deploy AI the right way” which is “thoughtfully, safely, and enormously beneficial for society.” 

“Some other labs are making decisions that clearly disregard safety and societal impact (e.g., bots that sometimes go full-fascist) and that’s a choice,” he added. 

It did not take Sacks long to find the post, which he quickly responded to, triggering a VIRTUAL standoff between them on X. In one post, Sacks claimed the “real issue” is “Anthropic’s agenda to backdoor Woke AI and other AI regulations through Blue states like California.”

Sacks also called Hoffman “the leading funder of lawfare and dirty tricks against President Trump” while Elon Musk, whose AI lab was not listed in Hoffman’s post, also chimed in with a one-word endorsement of Sacks’ stance.

Hoffman responded by writing: “Shows you didn’t read the post (not shocked). When you are ready to have a professional conversation about AI’s impact on America, I’m here to chat.”

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.