Congress Revives Digital Dollar Debate as Global CBDC Race Heats Up
Lawmakers reignite contentious discussions about a US central bank digital currency as China and Europe accelerate their own initiatives.
The Geopolitical Pressure Cooker
With over 90% of central banks now exploring digital currencies, Washington faces mounting pressure to keep pace. China's digital yuan already processes billions in transactions, while the European Central Bank advances its digital euro pilot—leaving the US playing catch-up in the financial technology arms race.
Policy Divisions Deepen
Republicans warn a digital dollar could threaten financial privacy and expand government surveillance capabilities. Democrats counter that failing to innovate risks dollar dominance—because nothing says 'global reserve currency' like clinging to paper while competitors build digital infrastructure.
The Banking Industry's Balancing Act
Major financial institutions express cautious interest—they want the efficiency gains but fear disintermediation. Meanwhile, crypto advocates push for decentralized alternatives, arguing Washington will inevitably add more surveillance than features.
As the debate intensifies, one thing's clear: when Congress finally moves, it'll be because foreign progress threatened dollar supremacy—not because American innovation demanded it.
Critics raise alarms over surveillance
Opponents argue that a retail CBDC could erode civil liberties. Representative Tom Emmer has warned such a system might give Washington direct oversight of citizens’ spending habits. His Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act – already passed in the House – seeks to prevent what he calls “programmable money” without cash-like privacy protections.
Advocates stress nuance
Policy voices counter that the debate often ignores key realities. Sheila Warren of the Project Liberty Institute notes that the Federal Reserve cannot launch a CBDC without congressional approval, and any privacy features WOULD be determined by design choices, not by default. She believes much of the rhetoric reflects politics rather than genuine technological risk.
Global momentum grows
Other regions are not waiting. China’s e-CNY is already in circulation, while Europe and India are piloting their own versions. The U.S., by contrast, has made little progress. Warren suggests wholesale CBDCs, which settle payments between banks, may hold some potential domestically, but she remains skeptical of a retail digital dollar ever launching.
READ MORE:
Stablecoins shift the landscape
Part of the reason urgency is fading is the booming role of stablecoins. The recently passed GENIUS Act gave dollar-backed tokens a clear regulatory framework, effectively legitimizing their place in the financial system. Warren calls them the “jet fuel” of the digital economy, driving payments and settlement without requiring a government-built alternative.
Privacy concerns beyond CBDCs
Ironically, while lawmakers warn about future state overreach, data collection by private corporations is already pervasive. From AI firms to automakers selling driver information, Warren argues the real privacy risks are present today — long before any digital dollar enters circulation.
