Solo Miner Strikes Gold: Bitcoin Block 903,883 Pays Out Big in 2025

One lucky miner just beat the house—and the mining pools—with a solo Bitcoin block win. The crypto underdog story we didn’t know we needed.

How it happened: Block 903,883 hit the chain with no corporate rigs, no cloud mining contracts—just raw hashpower and a prayer. The reward? Let’s just say it’s more than your average Wall Street bonus (and taxed at capital gains rates, naturally).

The irony: While hedge funds pile into Bitcoin ETFs, some anonymous coder with a basement ASIC farm just outplayed them all. The decentralized dream lives—for now.

In Brief

• An independent miner validated a Bitcoin block alone, earning 3.173 BTC, nearly $350,000.
• The feat was achieved via Solo CK Pool, a non-centralized mining platform with only 2.3 PH/s of power.
• According to the pool administrator, the chances of success were about 1 in 2,800 per day, representing a statistical win every 8 years.
• Despite its exceptional nature, this event rekindles the debate on the viability of solo mining in the face of increasing industrialization.

A Numerical Feat : Block 903,883 Mined by Chance

While bitcoin demand fell by 895,000 BTC Thursday evening, an independent miner operating via Solo CK Pool succeeded in validating block number 903,883 of the Bitcoin network, earning a reward of 3.173 BTC, or $349,028.

The event was made public by Dr. CK, developer and pool administrator, who praised the feat on X : “Congratulations to miner bc1q~9sj3 with 2.3 PH for solving block number 301”. According to him, “a miner of this size has about a 1 in 2,800 chance of validating a block each day, averaging a win every 8 years”.

This result highlights the extraordinarily improbable nature of such an event. To better understand the power dynamics at play, some key figures help measure the vast gap between the solo miner and the industry’s major players :

• The winning miner’s computing power : 2.3 PH/s (petahashes per second), or 0.00026 % of the total estimated hashrate of 881 EH/s ;
• A comparison with Foundry USA (the pool that mined the previous block) : 2.3 PH/s equals 0.000847 % of its 271.7 EH/s hashrate ;
• The reward obtained : 3.173 BTC, including the protocol’s fixed reward and transaction fees ;
• The tool used: Solo CK Pool, a non-profit service charging 2 % fees but allowing solo miners to operate without heavy infrastructure.

The lucky miner is not affiliated with a traditional pool but operates independently via this platform, which makes solo mining possible by reducing the technical barrier.

However, these attempts remain statistically doomed to failure given the overwhelming industrial competition today. This isolated success thus constitutes a mathematical anomaly rather than a viable economic model.

A Glimmer of Hope or a Statistical Mirage in an Industrialized Network ?

This isolated success occurs in a context of ultra-concentration of mining. Today, the vast majority of Bitcoin blocks are validated by a handful of industrial pools, such as Foundry USA, Antpool, or Binance Pool.

Solo mining, long considered obsolete, here resurfaces as a nod to the network’s origins. Yet, these bursts remain extremely rare. The last block found by a Solo CK user was four weeks ago, with a similar reward of 3.15 BTC. Before that, it took three months to see another success on this same platform.

Optiminer’s founder, Scott Norris, reminds us that solo mining is akin to a game of chance: “It’s like playing the lottery”, he points out. The numbers back him up.

Since 2014, Solo CK users have accumulated about 5,222 BTC, roughly $594.9 million at current prices—a total mostly made up of unique wins rather than a viable long-term strategy. Especially as the network’s complexity continues to grow: the hashrate surged by 46% in one year, making every attempt increasingly improbable.

In the medium term, these anecdotes may fuel an imagination of a more accessible bitcoin, but they do not constitute a sustainable alternative to current industrial power. However, they remind us that, despite the unbalanced power dynamics, the network’s open architecture still allows an isolated player to disrupt the established order, if only for the duration of a block. A strong symbol in an ecosystem often criticized for its increasing centralization.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.