Poland’s Crypto Bill Hits Roadblock: Parliament Upholds Presidential Veto, Stalling Regulatory Progress

Poland's cryptocurrency regulation just got punted back to the drawing board. Parliament failed to override the presidential veto, leaving the nation's digital asset framework in legislative limbo.

The Regulatory Standoff

This wasn't a quiet procedural hiccup—it was a full-stop rejection. The proposed legislation, which aimed to bring Polish crypto rules in line with broader EU standards, now faces an uncertain future. Supporters argued it provided much-needed clarity; critics called it rushed and potentially stifling.

Market Impact & Investor Sentiment

The delay creates immediate uncertainty for exchanges and crypto businesses operating in Poland. Without clear domestic rules, firms are stuck navigating a patchwork of interpretations—hardly the "innovation-friendly" environment politicians love to promise. Investors, meanwhile, are left wondering which regulatory shoe drops next.

Broader Implications for EU Crypto

Poland's stall contrasts sharply with the forward march of MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulation across the European Union. The bloc is pushing for harmonization, but national-level gridlock like this shows implementation won't be a smooth ride. It's a reminder that Brussels can write the rules, but member states still hold the pen on execution.

What Comes Next?

Lawmakers must now decide whether to revise the bill, start over, or let the issue languish. Each option carries political risk and market consequences. For the crypto industry, it's another chapter in the classic government playbook: announce big plans, get bogged down in details, and leave everyone waiting—while traditional finance quietly lobbies from the sidelines, of course.

The veto upholds a simple, cynical truth in finance: sometimes, the most profitable move is to delay change until you figure out how to profit from it.

In brief

• Parliament fails to override the veto on Poland’s crypto bill, halting plans for stricter oversight and sparking political tension.
• Tusk warns foreign intelligence uses crypto channels, but critics reject the bill’s scope and accuse the government of overreach.
• Nawrocki says the draft threatens freedoms and risks pushing crypto firms abroad due to long, complex, and restrictive rules.
• Officials debate how to meet EU MiCA standards while easing fears of misuse, high costs, and excessive regulatory powers.

Tusk Cites Foreign Intelligence Threats as Digital Asset Bill Faces Resistance

Tusk had pressed legislators to back tighter monitoring of digital assets, arguing that foreign intelligence services increasingly turn to crypto platforms for covert activity. His position did not gain enough support, as right-wing parties and the presidency opposed measures they viewed as excessive.

He described the outcome as a choice between safeguarding national interests and leaving regulators with limited ability to respond to interference. Several lawmakers dismissed that framing, calling it political pressure rather than a balanced review of the bill. 

According to a Reuters report, Tusk told parliament that the state needs updated supervision tools to keep pace with growing crypto markets.

President Nawrocki held a different view after blocking the Cryptoasset Market Act. In a Monday update on his website, he said parts of the draft threatened personal freedom, put property at risk, and weakened the country’s stability.

He warned that certain powers granted to regulators—including the ability to shut down company websites with minimal oversight—could be misused and lacked proper safeguards.

Tough Polish Rules Could Push Crypto Startups Abroad, Critics Warn

EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) served as the basis for Poland’s proposal. Even so, Nawrocki argued that Poland added far stricter requirements than those found in other member states. He cautioned that firms might shift operations to Czechia or Slovakia, where domestic rules are shorter, simpler, and easier to meet.

Concerns raised by the president and other critics include:

• Website-blocking rules without clear oversight.
• Regulatory fees that advantage large firms over startups.
• Licensing processes that take too long and add undue pressure.
• Enforcement powers with limited transparency.
• Compliance burdens are likely to push firms abroad.

Officials aligned with the presidency contended that the bill WOULD weaken Poland’s crypto sector and drive investment to neighboring countries. Nawrocki argued that firms should remain in Poland, compete on fair terms, and contribute to the economy rather than face excessive barriers.

Zbigniew Bogucki, head of the president’s chancellery, rejected claims that opposing the bill aligned lawmakers with hostile foreign actors. 

To stand on this podium and say, ‘Either you vote for the Russian mafia or you vote for my bill’ is to give a false choice and you know it perfectly well.

Calling the comparison false, he urged the government to cooperate with the presidential palace on a new draft that satisfies EU obligations without placing undue burdens on the industry.

Security officials have previously reported that Moscow used cryptocurrencies to finance sabotage attempts in the region, a claim Russia denies. Several EU states have also recorded an increase in cyberattacks and drone incursions this year, adding pressure on governments to update their digital-security measures.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.