From ADA Maxi to XRP Believer: Why This Analyst Points to Hoskinson-Garlinghouse Alignment

A seismic shift is rippling through crypto portfolios. One prominent Cardano maximalist just flipped the script—and their allegiance—to XRP. The reason? An unexpected alignment between two of crypto's most visible founders: Charles Hoskinson and Brad Garlinghouse.

The Catalyst: Shared Vision or Shared Foe?

For years, the Cardano and Ripple communities operated in parallel orbits. One focused on peer-reviewed, methodical development; the other on revolutionizing cross-border payments for institutions. The analyst cites a recent convergence in rhetoric and regulatory strategy as the turning point. Both founders now publicly champion a clear, innovation-friendly framework—and both have taken pointed jabs at what they see as regulatory overreach targeting their competitors.

Beyond the Tribal Lines

This isn't just about swapping one bag for another. It's a recognition that the next phase of crypto adoption won't be won by isolated tribes. The analyst highlights a pragmatic pivot: interoperability and real-world utility are the new battlegrounds. When foundational leaders start singing from the same hymn sheet on regulation and institutional adoption, it pays to listen—even if it means crossing community lines.

The Bottom Line: Follow the Smart Money (Or At Least The Loud Voices)

Let's be cynical for a second: in finance, alignment often precedes a coordinated pump. But look deeper. This shift signals a maturation in investor mindset—from blind maximalism to strategic realignment based on leadership signals and macro trends. When the founders stop fighting each other and start focusing on the real regulatory bottlenecks, maybe it's time to reconsider your own allocations. After all, in a market driven by narratives, the story just changed.

A crypto analyst known as Angry Crypto Show says he was hit with unexpected backlash after expanding his coverage from Cardano to XRP. In a recent episode of The Coin Zone, he described how a long break from content creation led him to rethink his direction, eventually pushing him into what he calls the “XRP rabbit hole.”

A Cardano Maxi Reflects and Reevaluates

The analyst said time away from YouTube gave him space to reset, focus on personal matters and reflect on his purpose. He said the break allowed him to think “inward,” citing Nikola Tesla’s view on solitude and self-development.

He admitted he considered stepping back from cardano content entirely, but decided it would make little sense to abandon a community that built his channel. Instead, he began exploring whether he could cover more than one ecosystem without losing his identity.

The Pivot That Sparked Backlash

His decision to start discussing XRP triggered strong reactions. “People asked why I was pivoting to XRP,” he said. “Some responses were harsh. But everyone has free will.”

He said the turning point came when he realized he didn’t need to choose. “It’s that meme: why not both? An abundant mindset works better for everyone,” he added.

Mixed Response From the Cardano Community

According to him, most viewers accepted the new direction, but a vocal minority pushed back. “Some told me I wasn’t part of the Cardano family anymore,” he said. “XRP bad, go away.”

He said that both XRP and Cardano communities face similar criticism in the wider market, often labeled “dinosaur coins.” Despite the pockets of resistance, he said a majority of ADA supporters embraced the broader focus, and XRP followers have also begun engaging with his work.

Hoskinson’s Comments Help Ease Tensions

The analyst said a recent moment of unity came when Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson joined an XRP Twitter Space. Hoskinson spoke positively about the project, praising Brad Garlinghouse and David Schwartz, and calling XRP “decentralized.”

“That matters,” the analyst said. “People look to Charles as a voice of reason. If he sees merit in XRP, others will start to look again.” He said his goal now is to help both communities see strengths on either side rather than treating ecosystems as rivals.