BTCC / BTCC Square / CoingabbarEN /
Quantum Computing Can’t Crack Bitcoin—Yet: Jameson Lopp Reveals Why Your Crypto Is Safe For Now

Quantum Computing Can’t Crack Bitcoin—Yet: Jameson Lopp Reveals Why Your Crypto Is Safe For Now

Published:
2025-12-22 07:30:00
20
1

Quantum computers won't be stealing your Bitcoin anytime soon. According to cypherpunk and Bitcoin expert Jameson Lopp, the existential threat to crypto's backbone remains firmly in the realm of theory—for now.

The Quantum Hype Versus Today's Reality

Headlines scream about quantum machines breaking modern encryption. The fear is a 'cryptographic apocalypse' where these super-powered computers crack Bitcoin's digital signatures and drain wallets. Lopp cuts through the noise: the hardware needed doesn't exist yet, and the timeline for a practical attack stretches years, if not decades, into the future.

Bitcoin's Built-In Defense Clock

The network isn't sitting idle. Lopp points to Bitcoin's inherent agility—its developer community and open-source code can implement quantum-resistant algorithms long before a threat materializes. The upgrade path is clearer than a central bank's rationale for printing more money. It's a race where defenders have a massive head start.

Why Panic Sells, But Preparedness Prevails

FUD—fear, uncertainty, and doubt—drives clicks and sells security audits. The quantum narrative is potent fuel. Yet, Lopp's analysis suggests the real risk isn't a surprise attack; it's a slow, visible arms race that Bitcoin is uniquely positioned to win through gradual, consensus-driven evolution.

So, relax. Your Satoshis are safer from quantum hackers than your savings are from inflation. The real threat today isn't a futuristic computer—it's still the old-fashioned kind of human error.

Quantum Computing vs Bitcoin

Source: Jameson Lopp X

Why Quantum Computers Are a Cause for Concern to the Bitcoin Community?

Quantum computers are frequently mentioned as a threat in the future since they, in theory, would be able to intercept the crypto of Bitcoin, namely ECDSA signatures. These signatures defend wallets and transactions.

Other headlines say that machines may suddenly break BTC and steal money. This has resulted in fear-based debates and extreme conditions, such as forced protocol changes or loss of coins. Experts argue. However, this is an overblown fear.

Jameson Lopp View: No Immediate Threat.

Jameson Lopp, co-founder and Chief Security Officer of Casa, has explicitly said that quantum computers will not pose a threat to bitcoin in the near future. In his opinion, the machines of today are too limited to be able to conduct such attacks.

The views of Lopp are consistent with the recent news of crypto research firms and institutions, which have verified that the current quantum hardware is not large-scale and stable enough to crack the encryption of cryptocurrency.

The Actual Difficulty: Time-wasting Bitcoin Upgrades.

Although quantum threats are far away, Lopp points to another issue, which is the time to upgrade BTC in case of necessity.

BTC is decentralized, which implies that the changes must:

  • Community agreement

  • Developer coordination

  • Software updates across the network.

  • Transfer of money to safer destinations.

Lopp approximates that in case Bitcoin requires quantum-resistant modifications, the operation might require 5 to 10 years. That is why it is important to be prepared in case the threat is not urgent.

Developers are already looking into the future.

The problem is not being overlooked by developers. Others, such as Adam Back, advocate the inclusion of optional quantum-ready features with existing upgrades such as Taproot. These will enable protection in the future without compelling one to change.

Meanwhile, cryptography standards based on post-quantum cryptography have been developed by organizations such as NIST since 2022, which allows BTC  to safely adapt to it.

Calm Down and Think Rationally.

The message that Jameson puts across is quite clear that decisions made out of fear might do more harm to Bitcoin (BTC) Price than computers themselves. The ecosystem must avoid rushing drastic upgrades or hard forks, instead doing research, testing, and gradual preparation.

Conclusion

In the near future, these computers will not break BTC, although it WOULD be negligent to disregard the risks in the future. The balanced opinion of Jameson promotes a peaceful confidence, relying on the existing safety but being ready to face the possible changes in technology in the long run.

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Please DYOR before investing. CoinGabbar is not responsible for any financial losses. Crypto assets are highly volatile and you can lose your entire investment.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.